diff options
| author | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> | 2015-02-23 04:31:41 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2015-02-24 08:44:16 +0100 |
| commit | 4d3199e4ca8e6670b54dc5ee070ffd54385988e9 (patch) | |
| tree | 5529bcb16c3217c02416e0d17d7c28f277c63581 /kernel/locking/mutex.c | |
| parent | Merge tag 'v4.0-rc1' into locking/core, to refresh the tree before merging ne... (diff) | |
| download | linux-4d3199e4ca8e6670b54dc5ee070ffd54385988e9.tar.xz linux-4d3199e4ca8e6670b54dc5ee070ffd54385988e9.zip | |
locking: Remove ACCESS_ONCE() usage
With the new standardized functions, we can replace all
ACCESS_ONCE() calls across relevant locking - this includes
lockref and seqlock while at it.
ACCESS_ONCE() does not work reliably on non-scalar types.
For example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag
for such accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of
aggregates) step:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145
Update the new calls regardless of if it is a scalar type,
this is cleaner than having three alternatives.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1424662301.6539.18.camel@stgolabs.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/locking/mutex.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/mutex.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c index 43bf25ef3c81..16b2d3cc88b0 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock) return 0; rcu_read_lock(); - owner = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->owner); + owner = READ_ONCE(lock->owner); if (owner) retval = owner->on_cpu; rcu_read_unlock(); @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static bool mutex_optimistic_spin(struct mutex *lock, * As such, when deadlock detection needs to be * performed the optimistic spinning cannot be done. */ - if (ACCESS_ONCE(ww->ctx)) + if (READ_ONCE(ww->ctx)) break; } @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static bool mutex_optimistic_spin(struct mutex *lock, * If there's an owner, wait for it to either * release the lock or go to sleep. */ - owner = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->owner); + owner = READ_ONCE(lock->owner); if (owner && !mutex_spin_on_owner(lock, owner)) break; @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static inline int __sched __ww_mutex_lock_check_stamp(struct mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx) { struct ww_mutex *ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base); - struct ww_acquire_ctx *hold_ctx = ACCESS_ONCE(ww->ctx); + struct ww_acquire_ctx *hold_ctx = READ_ONCE(ww->ctx); if (!hold_ctx) return 0; |