arch, locking: Ciao arch_mutex_cpu_relax()

The arch_mutex_cpu_relax() function, introduced by 34b133f, is
hacky and ugly. It was added a few years ago to address the fact
that common cpu_relax() calls include yielding on s390, and thus
impact the optimistic spinning functionality of mutexes. Nowadays
we use this function well beyond mutexes: rwsem, qrwlock, mcs and
lockref. Since the macro that defines the call is in the mutex header,
any users must include mutex.h and the naming is misleading as well.

This patch (i) renames the call to cpu_relax_lowlatency  ("relax, but
only if you can do it with very low latency") and (ii) defines it in
each arch's asm/processor.h local header, just like for regular cpu_relax
functions. On all archs, except s390, cpu_relax_lowlatency is simply cpu_relax,
and thus we can take it out of mutex.h. While this can seem redundant,
I believe it is a good choice as it allows us to move out arch specific
logic from generic locking primitives and enables future(?) archs to
transparently define it, similarly to System Z.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: Aurelien Jacquiot <a-jacquiot@ti.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Bharat Bhushan <r65777@freescale.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Chen Liqin <liqin.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Dominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com>
Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: James E.J. Bottomley <jejb@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>
Cc: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com>
Cc: Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com>
Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Cc: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Vasily Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: linux390@de.ibm.com
Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-am33-list@redhat.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org
Cc: linux-cris-kernel@axis.com
Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux@lists.openrisc.net
Cc: linux-m32r-ja@ml.linux-m32r.org
Cc: linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org
Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
Cc: linux-metag@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1404079773.2619.4.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

5 files changed, 13 insertions, 16 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c
index be9ee1559fca..9887a905a762 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c
@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
-
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
-#include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include "mcs_spinlock.h"
 
@@ -79,7 +77,7 @@ osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock,
 				break;
 		}
 
-		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
+		cpu_relax_lowlatency();
 	}
 
 	return next;
@@ -120,7 +118,7 @@ bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
 		if (need_resched())
 			goto unqueue;
 
-		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
+		cpu_relax_lowlatency();
 	}
 	return true;
 
@@ -146,7 +144,7 @@ unqueue:
 		if (smp_load_acquire(&node->locked))
 			return true;
 
-		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
+		cpu_relax_lowlatency();
 
 		/*
 		 * Or we race against a concurrent unqueue()'s step-B, in which
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
index 74356dc0ce29..23e89c5930e9 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct mcs_spinlock {
 #define arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended(l)					\
 do {									\
 	while (!(smp_load_acquire(l)))					\
-		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();					\
+		cpu_relax_lowlatency();					\
 } while (0)
 #endif
 
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void mcs_spin_unlock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
 			return;
 		/* Wait until the next pointer is set */
 		while (!(next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next)))
-			arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
+			cpu_relax_lowlatency();
 	}
 
 	/* Pass lock to next waiter. */
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index d3100521388c..ae712b25e492 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
 		if (need_resched())
 			break;
 
-		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
+		cpu_relax_lowlatency();
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
 		 * memory barriers as we'll eventually observe the right
 		 * values at the cost of a few extra spins.
 		 */
-		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
+		cpu_relax_lowlatency();
 	}
 	osq_unlock(&lock->osq);
 slowpath:
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
index fb5b8ac411a5..f956ede7f90d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
 #include <linux/cpumask.h>
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
 #include <linux/hardirq.h>
-#include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <asm/qrwlock.h>
 
 /**
@@ -35,7 +34,7 @@ static __always_inline void
 rspin_until_writer_unlock(struct qrwlock *lock, u32 cnts)
 {
 	while ((cnts & _QW_WMASK) == _QW_LOCKED) {
-		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
+		cpu_relax_lowlatency();
 		cnts = smp_load_acquire((u32 *)&lock->cnts);
 	}
 }
@@ -75,7 +74,7 @@ void queue_read_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock)
 	 * to make sure that the write lock isn't taken.
 	 */
 	while (atomic_read(&lock->cnts) & _QW_WMASK)
-		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
+		cpu_relax_lowlatency();
 
 	cnts = atomic_add_return(_QR_BIAS, &lock->cnts) - _QR_BIAS;
 	rspin_until_writer_unlock(lock, cnts);
@@ -114,7 +113,7 @@ void queue_write_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock)
 				    cnts | _QW_WAITING) == cnts))
 			break;
 
-		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
+		cpu_relax_lowlatency();
 	}
 
 	/* When no more readers, set the locked flag */
@@ -125,7 +124,7 @@ void queue_write_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock)
 				    _QW_LOCKED) == _QW_WAITING))
 			break;
 
-		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
+		cpu_relax_lowlatency();
 	}
 unlock:
 	arch_spin_unlock(&lock->lock);
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index a2391ac135c8..d6203faf2eb1 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ bool rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct task_struct *owner)
 		if (need_resched())
 			break;
 
-		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
+		cpu_relax_lowlatency();
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 		 * memory barriers as we'll eventually observe the right
 		 * values at the cost of a few extra spins.
 		 */
-		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
+		cpu_relax_lowlatency();
 	}
 	osq_unlock(&sem->osq);
 done: