summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/locking
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2017-05-02 04:36:00 +0200
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2017-05-02 04:36:00 +0200
commit207fb8c3049cdc31de20ca9f91d0ae319125eb62 (patch)
tree371c255b69629a28aff45a9ea2fcb05fe3fd35ff /kernel/locking
parentMerge branch 'sched-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/ker... (diff)
parentMAINTAINERS: Add FUTEX SUBSYSTEM (diff)
downloadlinux-207fb8c3049cdc31de20ca9f91d0ae319125eb62.tar.xz
linux-207fb8c3049cdc31de20ca9f91d0ae319125eb62.zip
Merge branch 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar: "The main changes in this cycle were: - a big round of FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI improvements, fixes, cleanups and general restructuring - lockdep updates such as new checks for lock_downgrade() - introduce the new atomic_try_cmpxchg() locking API and use it to optimize refcount code generation - ... plus misc fixes, updates and cleanups" * 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (38 commits) MAINTAINERS: Add FUTEX SUBSYSTEM futex: Clarify mark_wake_futex memory barrier usage futex: Fix small (and harmless looking) inconsistencies futex: Avoid freeing an active timer rtmutex: Plug preempt count leak in rt_mutex_futex_unlock() rtmutex: Fix more prio comparisons rtmutex: Fix PI chain order integrity sched,tracing: Update trace_sched_pi_setprio() sched/rtmutex: Refactor rt_mutex_setprio() rtmutex: Clean up sched/deadline/rtmutex: Dont miss the dl_runtime/dl_period update sched/rtmutex/deadline: Fix a PI crash for deadline tasks rtmutex: Deboost before waking up the top waiter locking/ww-mutex: Limit stress test to 2 seconds locking/atomic: Fix atomic_try_cmpxchg() semantics lockdep: Fix per-cpu static objects futex: Drop hb->lock before enqueueing on the rtmutex futex: Futex_unlock_pi() determinism futex: Rework futex_lock_pi() to use rt_mutex_*_proxy_lock() futex,rt_mutex: Restructure rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock() ...
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/locking')
-rw-r--r--kernel/locking/lockdep.c242
-rw-r--r--kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c9
-rw-r--r--kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.h3
-rw-r--r--kernel/locking/rtmutex.c390
-rw-r--r--kernel/locking/rtmutex.h2
-rw-r--r--kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h25
-rw-r--r--kernel/locking/rwsem.c6
-rw-r--r--kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c29
8 files changed, 418 insertions, 288 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index a95e5d1f4a9c..98dd6231d43b 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -660,6 +660,7 @@ look_up_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass)
struct lockdep_subclass_key *key;
struct hlist_head *hash_head;
struct lock_class *class;
+ bool is_static = false;
if (unlikely(subclass >= MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES)) {
debug_locks_off();
@@ -673,10 +674,23 @@ look_up_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass)
/*
* Static locks do not have their class-keys yet - for them the key
- * is the lock object itself:
+ * is the lock object itself. If the lock is in the per cpu area,
+ * the canonical address of the lock (per cpu offset removed) is
+ * used.
*/
- if (unlikely(!lock->key))
- lock->key = (void *)lock;
+ if (unlikely(!lock->key)) {
+ unsigned long can_addr, addr = (unsigned long)lock;
+
+ if (__is_kernel_percpu_address(addr, &can_addr))
+ lock->key = (void *)can_addr;
+ else if (__is_module_percpu_address(addr, &can_addr))
+ lock->key = (void *)can_addr;
+ else if (static_obj(lock))
+ lock->key = (void *)lock;
+ else
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ is_static = true;
+ }
/*
* NOTE: the class-key must be unique. For dynamic locks, a static
@@ -708,7 +722,7 @@ look_up_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass)
}
}
- return NULL;
+ return is_static || static_obj(lock->key) ? NULL : ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
/*
@@ -726,19 +740,18 @@ register_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, int force)
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
class = look_up_lock_class(lock, subclass);
- if (likely(class))
+ if (likely(!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(class)))
goto out_set_class_cache;
/*
* Debug-check: all keys must be persistent!
- */
- if (!static_obj(lock->key)) {
+ */
+ if (IS_ERR(class)) {
debug_locks_off();
printk("INFO: trying to register non-static key.\n");
printk("the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.\n");
printk("turning off the locking correctness validator.\n");
dump_stack();
-
return NULL;
}
@@ -3419,7 +3432,7 @@ static int match_held_lock(struct held_lock *hlock, struct lockdep_map *lock)
* Clearly if the lock hasn't been acquired _ever_, we're not
* holding it either, so report failure.
*/
- if (!class)
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(class))
return 0;
/*
@@ -3437,13 +3450,67 @@ static int match_held_lock(struct held_lock *hlock, struct lockdep_map *lock)
return 0;
}
+/* @depth must not be zero */
+static struct held_lock *find_held_lock(struct task_struct *curr,
+ struct lockdep_map *lock,
+ unsigned int depth, int *idx)
+{
+ struct held_lock *ret, *hlock, *prev_hlock;
+ int i;
+
+ i = depth - 1;
+ hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
+ ret = hlock;
+ if (match_held_lock(hlock, lock))
+ goto out;
+
+ ret = NULL;
+ for (i--, prev_hlock = hlock--;
+ i >= 0;
+ i--, prev_hlock = hlock--) {
+ /*
+ * We must not cross into another context:
+ */
+ if (prev_hlock->irq_context != hlock->irq_context) {
+ ret = NULL;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (match_held_lock(hlock, lock)) {
+ ret = hlock;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+out:
+ *idx = i;
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int reacquire_held_locks(struct task_struct *curr, unsigned int depth,
+ int idx)
+{
+ struct held_lock *hlock;
+
+ for (hlock = curr->held_locks + idx; idx < depth; idx++, hlock++) {
+ if (!__lock_acquire(hlock->instance,
+ hlock_class(hlock)->subclass,
+ hlock->trylock,
+ hlock->read, hlock->check,
+ hlock->hardirqs_off,
+ hlock->nest_lock, hlock->acquire_ip,
+ hlock->references, hlock->pin_count))
+ return 1;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int
__lock_set_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
struct lock_class_key *key, unsigned int subclass,
unsigned long ip)
{
struct task_struct *curr = current;
- struct held_lock *hlock, *prev_hlock;
+ struct held_lock *hlock;
struct lock_class *class;
unsigned int depth;
int i;
@@ -3456,21 +3523,10 @@ __lock_set_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!depth))
return 0;
- prev_hlock = NULL;
- for (i = depth-1; i >= 0; i--) {
- hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
- /*
- * We must not cross into another context:
- */
- if (prev_hlock && prev_hlock->irq_context != hlock->irq_context)
- break;
- if (match_held_lock(hlock, lock))
- goto found_it;
- prev_hlock = hlock;
- }
- return print_unlock_imbalance_bug(curr, lock, ip);
+ hlock = find_held_lock(curr, lock, depth, &i);
+ if (!hlock)
+ return print_unlock_imbalance_bug(curr, lock, ip);
-found_it:
lockdep_init_map(lock, name, key, 0);
class = register_lock_class(lock, subclass, 0);
hlock->class_idx = class - lock_classes + 1;
@@ -3478,15 +3534,46 @@ found_it:
curr->lockdep_depth = i;
curr->curr_chain_key = hlock->prev_chain_key;
- for (; i < depth; i++) {
- hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
- if (!__lock_acquire(hlock->instance,
- hlock_class(hlock)->subclass, hlock->trylock,
- hlock->read, hlock->check, hlock->hardirqs_off,
- hlock->nest_lock, hlock->acquire_ip,
- hlock->references, hlock->pin_count))
- return 0;
- }
+ if (reacquire_held_locks(curr, depth, i))
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * I took it apart and put it back together again, except now I have
+ * these 'spare' parts.. where shall I put them.
+ */
+ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(curr->lockdep_depth != depth))
+ return 0;
+ return 1;
+}
+
+static int __lock_downgrade(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned long ip)
+{
+ struct task_struct *curr = current;
+ struct held_lock *hlock;
+ unsigned int depth;
+ int i;
+
+ depth = curr->lockdep_depth;
+ /*
+ * This function is about (re)setting the class of a held lock,
+ * yet we're not actually holding any locks. Naughty user!
+ */
+ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!depth))
+ return 0;
+
+ hlock = find_held_lock(curr, lock, depth, &i);
+ if (!hlock)
+ return print_unlock_imbalance_bug(curr, lock, ip);
+
+ curr->lockdep_depth = i;
+ curr->curr_chain_key = hlock->prev_chain_key;
+
+ WARN(hlock->read, "downgrading a read lock");
+ hlock->read = 1;
+ hlock->acquire_ip = ip;
+
+ if (reacquire_held_locks(curr, depth, i))
+ return 0;
/*
* I took it apart and put it back together again, except now I have
@@ -3508,7 +3595,7 @@ static int
__lock_release(struct lockdep_map *lock, int nested, unsigned long ip)
{
struct task_struct *curr = current;
- struct held_lock *hlock, *prev_hlock;
+ struct held_lock *hlock;
unsigned int depth;
int i;
@@ -3527,21 +3614,10 @@ __lock_release(struct lockdep_map *lock, int nested, unsigned long ip)
* Check whether the lock exists in the current stack
* of held locks:
*/
- prev_hlock = NULL;
- for (i = depth-1; i >= 0; i--) {
- hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
- /*
- * We must not cross into another context:
- */
- if (prev_hlock && prev_hlock->irq_context != hlock->irq_context)
- break;
- if (match_held_lock(hlock, lock))
- goto found_it;
- prev_hlock = hlock;
- }
- return print_unlock_imbalance_bug(curr, lock, ip);
+ hlock = find_held_lock(curr, lock, depth, &i);
+ if (!hlock)
+ return print_unlock_imbalance_bug(curr, lock, ip);
-found_it:
if (hlock->instance == lock)
lock_release_holdtime(hlock);
@@ -3568,15 +3644,8 @@ found_it:
curr->lockdep_depth = i;
curr->curr_chain_key = hlock->prev_chain_key;
- for (i++; i < depth; i++) {
- hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
- if (!__lock_acquire(hlock->instance,
- hlock_class(hlock)->subclass, hlock->trylock,
- hlock->read, hlock->check, hlock->hardirqs_off,
- hlock->nest_lock, hlock->acquire_ip,
- hlock->references, hlock->pin_count))
- return 0;
- }
+ if (reacquire_held_locks(curr, depth, i + 1))
+ return 0;
/*
* We had N bottles of beer on the wall, we drank one, but now
@@ -3741,6 +3810,23 @@ void lock_set_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_set_class);
+void lock_downgrade(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned long ip)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (unlikely(current->lockdep_recursion))
+ return;
+
+ raw_local_irq_save(flags);
+ current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+ check_flags(flags);
+ if (__lock_downgrade(lock, ip))
+ check_chain_key(current);
+ current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+ raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_downgrade);
+
/*
* We are not always called with irqs disabled - do that here,
* and also avoid lockdep recursion:
@@ -3903,7 +3989,7 @@ static void
__lock_contended(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned long ip)
{
struct task_struct *curr = current;
- struct held_lock *hlock, *prev_hlock;
+ struct held_lock *hlock;
struct lock_class_stats *stats;
unsigned int depth;
int i, contention_point, contending_point;
@@ -3916,22 +4002,12 @@ __lock_contended(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned long ip)
if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!depth))
return;
- prev_hlock = NULL;
- for (i = depth-1; i >= 0; i--) {
- hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
- /*
- * We must not cross into another context:
- */
- if (prev_hlock && prev_hlock->irq_context != hlock->irq_context)
- break;
- if (match_held_lock(hlock, lock))
- goto found_it;
- prev_hlock = hlock;
+ hlock = find_held_lock(curr, lock, depth, &i);
+ if (!hlock) {
+ print_lock_contention_bug(curr, lock, ip);
+ return;
}
- print_lock_contention_bug(curr, lock, ip);
- return;
-found_it:
if (hlock->instance != lock)
return;
@@ -3955,7 +4031,7 @@ static void
__lock_acquired(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned long ip)
{
struct task_struct *curr = current;
- struct held_lock *hlock, *prev_hlock;
+ struct held_lock *hlock;
struct lock_class_stats *stats;
unsigned int depth;
u64 now, waittime = 0;
@@ -3969,22 +4045,12 @@ __lock_acquired(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned long ip)
if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!depth))
return;
- prev_hlock = NULL;
- for (i = depth-1; i >= 0; i--) {
- hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
- /*
- * We must not cross into another context:
- */
- if (prev_hlock && prev_hlock->irq_context != hlock->irq_context)
- break;
- if (match_held_lock(hlock, lock))
- goto found_it;
- prev_hlock = hlock;
+ hlock = find_held_lock(curr, lock, depth, &i);
+ if (!hlock) {
+ print_lock_contention_bug(curr, lock, _RET_IP_);
+ return;
}
- print_lock_contention_bug(curr, lock, _RET_IP_);
- return;
-found_it:
if (hlock->instance != lock)
return;
@@ -4172,7 +4238,7 @@ void lockdep_reset_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
* If the class exists we look it up and zap it:
*/
class = look_up_lock_class(lock, j);
- if (class)
+ if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(class))
zap_class(class);
}
/*
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c
index 97ee9df32e0f..32fe775a2eaf 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c
@@ -174,12 +174,3 @@ void debug_rt_mutex_init(struct rt_mutex *lock, const char *name)
lock->name = name;
}
-void
-rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *task)
-{
-}
-
-void rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(struct task_struct *task)
-{
-}
-
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.h b/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.h
index d0519c3432b6..b585af9a1b50 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.h
@@ -9,9 +9,6 @@
* This file contains macros used solely by rtmutex.c. Debug version.
*/
-extern void
-rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *task);
-extern void rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(struct task_struct *task);
extern void debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter);
extern void debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter);
extern void debug_rt_mutex_init(struct rt_mutex *lock, const char *name);
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 6edc32ecd9c5..b95509416909 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -224,6 +224,12 @@ static inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex *lock,
}
#endif
+/*
+ * Only use with rt_mutex_waiter_{less,equal}()
+ */
+#define task_to_waiter(p) \
+ &(struct rt_mutex_waiter){ .prio = (p)->prio, .deadline = (p)->dl.deadline }
+
static inline int
rt_mutex_waiter_less(struct rt_mutex_waiter *left,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *right)
@@ -238,12 +244,30 @@ rt_mutex_waiter_less(struct rt_mutex_waiter *left,
* then right waiter has a dl_prio() too.
*/
if (dl_prio(left->prio))
- return dl_time_before(left->task->dl.deadline,
- right->task->dl.deadline);
+ return dl_time_before(left->deadline, right->deadline);
return 0;
}
+static inline int
+rt_mutex_waiter_equal(struct rt_mutex_waiter *left,
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter *right)
+{
+ if (left->prio != right->prio)
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * If both waiters have dl_prio(), we check the deadlines of the
+ * associated tasks.
+ * If left waiter has a dl_prio(), and we didn't return 0 above,
+ * then right waiter has a dl_prio() too.
+ */
+ if (dl_prio(left->prio))
+ return left->deadline == right->deadline;
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
static void
rt_mutex_enqueue(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
{
@@ -322,72 +346,16 @@ rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(struct task_struct *task, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry);
}
-/*
- * Calculate task priority from the waiter tree priority
- *
- * Return task->normal_prio when the waiter tree is empty or when
- * the waiter is not allowed to do priority boosting
- */
-int rt_mutex_getprio(struct task_struct *task)
-{
- if (likely(!task_has_pi_waiters(task)))
- return task->normal_prio;
-
- return min(task_top_pi_waiter(task)->prio,
- task->normal_prio);
-}
-
-struct task_struct *rt_mutex_get_top_task(struct task_struct *task)
+static void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *p)
{
- if (likely(!task_has_pi_waiters(task)))
- return NULL;
-
- return task_top_pi_waiter(task)->task;
-}
+ struct task_struct *pi_task = NULL;
-/*
- * Called by sched_setscheduler() to get the priority which will be
- * effective after the change.
- */
-int rt_mutex_get_effective_prio(struct task_struct *task, int newprio)
-{
- if (!task_has_pi_waiters(task))
- return newprio;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock);
- if (task_top_pi_waiter(task)->task->prio <= newprio)
- return task_top_pi_waiter(task)->task->prio;
- return newprio;
-}
+ if (task_has_pi_waiters(p))
+ pi_task = task_top_pi_waiter(p)->task;
-/*
- * Adjust the priority of a task, after its pi_waiters got modified.
- *
- * This can be both boosting and unboosting. task->pi_lock must be held.
- */
-static void __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task)
-{
- int prio = rt_mutex_getprio(task);
-
- if (task->prio != prio || dl_prio(prio))
- rt_mutex_setprio(task, prio);
-}
-
-/*
- * Adjust task priority (undo boosting). Called from the exit path of
- * rt_mutex_slowunlock() and rt_mutex_slowlock().
- *
- * (Note: We do this outside of the protection of lock->wait_lock to
- * allow the lock to be taken while or before we readjust the priority
- * of task. We do not use the spin_xx_mutex() variants here as we are
- * outside of the debug path.)
- */
-void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task)
-{
- unsigned long flags;
-
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
- __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
+ rt_mutex_setprio(p, pi_task);
}
/*
@@ -610,7 +578,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
* enabled we continue, but stop the requeueing in the chain
* walk.
*/
- if (waiter->prio == task->prio) {
+ if (rt_mutex_waiter_equal(waiter, task_to_waiter(task))) {
if (!detect_deadlock)
goto out_unlock_pi;
else
@@ -706,7 +674,26 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
/* [7] Requeue the waiter in the lock waiter tree. */
rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
+
+ /*
+ * Update the waiter prio fields now that we're dequeued.
+ *
+ * These values can have changed through either:
+ *
+ * sys_sched_set_scheduler() / sys_sched_setattr()
+ *
+ * or
+ *
+ * DL CBS enforcement advancing the effective deadline.
+ *
+ * Even though pi_waiters also uses these fields, and that tree is only
+ * updated in [11], we can do this here, since we hold [L], which
+ * serializes all pi_waiters access and rb_erase() does not care about
+ * the values of the node being removed.
+ */
waiter->prio = task->prio;
+ waiter->deadline = task->dl.deadline;
+
rt_mutex_enqueue(lock, waiter);
/* [8] Release the task */
@@ -747,7 +734,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
*/
rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, prerequeue_top_waiter);
rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
- __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
+ rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
} else if (prerequeue_top_waiter == waiter) {
/*
@@ -763,7 +750,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter);
waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
- __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
+ rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
} else {
/*
* Nothing changed. No need to do any priority
@@ -833,6 +820,8 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
static int try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *task,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
{
+ lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock);
+
/*
* Before testing whether we can acquire @lock, we set the
* RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS bit in @lock->owner. This forces all
@@ -892,7 +881,8 @@ static int try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *task,
* the top waiter priority (kernel view),
* @task lost.
*/
- if (task->prio >= rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->prio)
+ if (!rt_mutex_waiter_less(task_to_waiter(task),
+ rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)))
return 0;
/*
@@ -938,8 +928,6 @@ takeit:
*/
rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, task);
- rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, task);
-
return 1;
}
@@ -960,6 +948,8 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct rt_mutex *next_lock;
int chain_walk = 0, res;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock);
+
/*
* Early deadlock detection. We really don't want the task to
* enqueue on itself just to untangle the mess later. It's not
@@ -973,10 +963,11 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
return -EDEADLK;
raw_spin_lock(&task->pi_lock);
- __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
+ rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
waiter->task = task;
waiter->lock = lock;
waiter->prio = task->prio;
+ waiter->deadline = task->dl.deadline;
/* Get the top priority waiter on the lock */
if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
@@ -995,7 +986,7 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(owner, top_waiter);
rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(owner, waiter);
- __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner);
+ rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner);
if (owner->pi_blocked_on)
chain_walk = 1;
} else if (rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(waiter, chwalk)) {
@@ -1047,12 +1038,14 @@ static void mark_wakeup_next_waiter(struct wake_q_head *wake_q,
waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
/*
- * Remove it from current->pi_waiters. We do not adjust a
- * possible priority boost right now. We execute wakeup in the
- * boosted mode and go back to normal after releasing
- * lock->wait_lock.
+ * Remove it from current->pi_waiters and deboost.
+ *
+ * We must in fact deboost here in order to ensure we call
+ * rt_mutex_setprio() to update p->pi_top_task before the
+ * task unblocks.
*/
rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(current, waiter);
+ rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current);
/*
* As we are waking up the top waiter, and the waiter stays
@@ -1064,9 +1057,19 @@ static void mark_wakeup_next_waiter(struct wake_q_head *wake_q,
*/
lock->owner = (void *) RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS;
- raw_spin_unlock(&current->pi_lock);
-
+ /*
+ * We deboosted before waking the top waiter task such that we don't
+ * run two tasks with the 'same' priority (and ensure the
+ * p->pi_top_task pointer points to a blocked task). This however can
+ * lead to priority inversion if we would get preempted after the
+ * deboost but before waking our donor task, hence the preempt_disable()
+ * before unlock.
+ *
+ * Pairs with preempt_enable() in rt_mutex_postunlock();
+ */
+ preempt_disable();
wake_q_add(wake_q, waiter->task);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&current->pi_lock);
}
/*
@@ -1082,6 +1085,8 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
struct rt_mutex *next_lock;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock);
+
raw_spin_lock(&current->pi_lock);
rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
current->pi_blocked_on = NULL;
@@ -1101,7 +1106,7 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,
if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(owner, rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock));
- __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner);
+ rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner);
/* Store the lock on which owner is blocked or NULL */
next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(owner);
@@ -1140,8 +1145,7 @@ void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task)
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
waiter = task->pi_blocked_on;
- if (!waiter || (waiter->prio == task->prio &&
- !dl_prio(task->prio))) {
+ if (!waiter || rt_mutex_waiter_equal(waiter, task_to_waiter(task))) {
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
return;
}
@@ -1155,6 +1159,14 @@ void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task)
next_lock, NULL, task);
}
+void rt_mutex_init_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
+{
+ debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(waiter);
+ RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry);
+ RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry);
+ waiter->task = NULL;
+}
+
/**
* __rt_mutex_slowlock() - Perform the wait-wake-try-to-take loop
* @lock: the rt_mutex to take
@@ -1237,9 +1249,7 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
unsigned long flags;
int ret = 0;
- debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(&waiter);
- RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter.pi_tree_entry);
- RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter.tree_entry);
+ rt_mutex_init_waiter(&waiter);
/*
* Technically we could use raw_spin_[un]lock_irq() here, but this can
@@ -1330,7 +1340,8 @@ static inline int rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
/*
* Slow path to release a rt-mutex.
- * Return whether the current task needs to undo a potential priority boosting.
+ *
+ * Return whether the current task needs to call rt_mutex_postunlock().
*/
static bool __sched rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
@@ -1342,8 +1353,6 @@ static bool __sched rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
debug_rt_mutex_unlock(lock);
- rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(current);
-
/*
* We must be careful here if the fast path is enabled. If we
* have no waiters queued we cannot set owner to NULL here
@@ -1390,11 +1399,9 @@ static bool __sched rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
* Queue the next waiter for wakeup once we release the wait_lock.
*/
mark_wakeup_next_waiter(wake_q, lock);
-
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
- /* check PI boosting */
- return true;
+ return true; /* call rt_mutex_postunlock() */
}
/*
@@ -1409,11 +1416,10 @@ rt_mutex_fastlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk))
{
- if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current))) {
- rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current);
+ if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current)))
return 0;
- } else
- return slowfn(lock, state, NULL, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK);
+
+ return slowfn(lock, state, NULL, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK);
}
static inline int
@@ -1425,24 +1431,33 @@ rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk))
{
if (chwalk == RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK &&
- likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current))) {
- rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current);
+ likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current)))
return 0;
- } else
- return slowfn(lock, state, timeout, chwalk);
+
+ return slowfn(lock, state, timeout, chwalk);
}
static inline int
rt_mutex_fasttrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock))
{
- if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current))) {
- rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current);
+ if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current)))
return 1;
- }
+
return slowfn(lock);
}
+/*
+ * Performs the wakeup of the the top-waiter and re-enables preemption.
+ */
+void rt_mutex_postunlock(struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
+{
+ wake_up_q(wake_q);
+
+ /* Pairs with preempt_disable() in rt_mutex_slowunlock() */
+ preempt_enable();
+}
+
static inline void
rt_mutex_fastunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
bool (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock,
@@ -1450,18 +1465,11 @@ rt_mutex_fastunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
{
DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
- if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(lock, current, NULL))) {
- rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(current);
-
- } else {
- bool deboost = slowfn(lock, &wake_q);
-
- wake_up_q(&wake_q);
+ if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(lock, current, NULL)))
+ return;
- /* Undo pi boosting if necessary: */
- if (deboost)
- rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current);
- }
+ if (slowfn(lock, &wake_q))
+ rt_mutex_postunlock(&wake_q);
}
/**
@@ -1495,16 +1503,11 @@ int __sched rt_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct rt_mutex *lock)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock_interruptible);
/*
- * Futex variant with full deadlock detection.
+ * Futex variant, must not use fastpath.
*/
-int rt_mutex_timed_futex_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
- struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout)
+int __sched rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
{
- might_sleep();
-
- return rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout,
- RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK,
- rt_mutex_slowlock);
+ return rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock);
}
/**
@@ -1563,20 +1566,43 @@ void __sched rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_unlock);
/**
- * rt_mutex_futex_unlock - Futex variant of rt_mutex_unlock
- * @lock: the rt_mutex to be unlocked
- *
- * Returns: true/false indicating whether priority adjustment is
- * required or not.
+ * Futex variant, that since futex variants do not use the fast-path, can be
+ * simple and will not need to retry.
*/
-bool __sched rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
- struct wake_q_head *wqh)
+bool __sched __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+ struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
{
- if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(lock, current, NULL))) {
- rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(current);
- return false;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock);
+
+ debug_rt_mutex_unlock(lock);
+
+ if (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) {
+ lock->owner = NULL;
+ return false; /* done */
}
- return rt_mutex_slowunlock(lock, wqh);
+
+ /*
+ * We've already deboosted, mark_wakeup_next_waiter() will
+ * retain preempt_disabled when we drop the wait_lock, to
+ * avoid inversion prior to the wakeup. preempt_disable()
+ * therein pairs with rt_mutex_postunlock().
+ */
+ mark_wakeup_next_waiter(wake_q, lock);
+
+ return true; /* call postunlock() */
+}
+
+void __sched rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+ DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
+ bool postunlock;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+ postunlock = __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(lock, &wake_q);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+
+ if (postunlock)
+ rt_mutex_postunlock(&wake_q);
}
/**
@@ -1637,7 +1663,6 @@ void rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex *lock,
__rt_mutex_init(lock, NULL);
debug_rt_mutex_proxy_lock(lock, proxy_owner);
rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, proxy_owner);
- rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, proxy_owner);
}
/**
@@ -1657,34 +1682,16 @@ void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
{
debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(lock);
rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, NULL);
- rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(proxy_owner);
}
-/**
- * rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() - Start lock acquisition for another task
- * @lock: the rt_mutex to take
- * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
- * @task: the task to prepare
- *
- * Returns:
- * 0 - task blocked on lock
- * 1 - acquired the lock for task, caller should wake it up
- * <0 - error
- *
- * Special API call for FUTEX_REQUEUE_PI support.
- */
-int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+int __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
struct task_struct *task)
{
int ret;
- raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
-
- if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, task, NULL)) {
- raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+ if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, task, NULL))
return 1;
- }
/* We enforce deadlock detection for futexes */
ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task,
@@ -1703,14 +1710,38 @@ int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
if (unlikely(ret))
remove_waiter(lock, waiter);
- raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
-
debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(waiter);
return ret;
}
/**
+ * rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() - Start lock acquisition for another task
+ * @lock: the rt_mutex to take
+ * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
+ * @task: the task to prepare
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * 0 - task blocked on lock
+ * 1 - acquired the lock for task, caller should wake it up
+ * <0 - error
+ *
+ * Special API call for FUTEX_REQUEUE_PI support.
+ */
+int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
+ struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+ ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(lock, waiter, task);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/**
* rt_mutex_next_owner - return the next owner of the lock
*
* @lock: the rt lock query
@@ -1731,21 +1762,23 @@ struct task_struct *rt_mutex_next_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock)
}
/**
- * rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock() - Complete lock acquisition
+ * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() - Wait for lock acquisition
* @lock: the rt_mutex we were woken on
* @to: the timeout, null if none. hrtimer should already have
* been started.
* @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
*
- * Complete the lock acquisition started our behalf by another thread.
+ * Wait for the the lock acquisition started on our behalf by
+ * rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(). Upon failure, the caller must call
+ * rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock().
*
* Returns:
* 0 - success
* <0 - error, one of -EINTR, -ETIMEDOUT
*
- * Special API call for PI-futex requeue support
+ * Special API call for PI-futex support
*/
-int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+int rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct hrtimer_sleeper *to,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
{
@@ -1758,8 +1791,45 @@ int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
/* sleep on the mutex */
ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, to, waiter);
- if (unlikely(ret))
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock() - Cleanup failed lock acquisition
+ * @lock: the rt_mutex we were woken on
+ * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
+ *
+ * Attempt to clean up after a failed rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock().
+ *
+ * Unless we acquired the lock; we're still enqueued on the wait-list and can
+ * in fact still be granted ownership until we're removed. Therefore we can
+ * find we are in fact the owner and must disregard the
+ * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() failure.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * true - did the cleanup, we done.
+ * false - we acquired the lock after rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() returned,
+ * caller should disregards its return value.
+ *
+ * Special API call for PI-futex support
+ */
+bool rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
+{
+ bool cleanup = false;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+ /*
+ * Unless we're the owner; we're still enqueued on the wait_list.
+ * So check if we became owner, if not, take us off the wait_list.
+ */
+ if (rt_mutex_owner(lock) != current) {
remove_waiter(lock, waiter);
+ fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
+ cleanup = true;
+ }
/*
* try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might
@@ -1769,5 +1839,5 @@ int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
- return ret;
+ return cleanup;
}
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.h b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.h
index c4060584c407..6607802efa8b 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.h
@@ -11,8 +11,6 @@
*/
#define rt_mutex_deadlock_check(l) (0)
-#define rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(m, t) do { } while (0)
-#define rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(l) do { } while (0)
#define debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(w) do { } while (0)
#define debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(w) do { } while (0)
#define debug_rt_mutex_lock(l) do { } while (0)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
index 856dfff5c33a..72ad45a9a794 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ struct rt_mutex_waiter {
struct rt_mutex *deadlock_lock;
#endif
int prio;
+ u64 deadline;
};
/*
@@ -103,16 +104,26 @@ extern void rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct task_struct *proxy_owner);
extern void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct task_struct *proxy_owner);
+extern void rt_mutex_init_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter);
+extern int __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
+ struct task_struct *task);
extern int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
struct task_struct *task);
-extern int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
- struct hrtimer_sleeper *to,
- struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter);
-extern int rt_mutex_timed_futex_lock(struct rt_mutex *l, struct hrtimer_sleeper *to);
-extern bool rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
- struct wake_q_head *wqh);
-extern void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task);
+extern int rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+ struct hrtimer_sleeper *to,
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter);
+extern bool rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter);
+
+extern int rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *l);
+
+extern void rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock);
+extern bool __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+ struct wake_q_head *wqh);
+
+extern void rt_mutex_postunlock(struct wake_q_head *wake_q);
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
# include "rtmutex-debug.h"
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
index 90a74ccd85a4..4d48b1c4870d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -124,10 +124,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(up_write);
*/
void downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
- /*
- * lockdep: a downgraded write will live on as a write
- * dependency.
- */
+ lock_downgrade(&sem->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
+
rwsem_set_reader_owned(sem);
__downgrade_write(sem);
}
diff --git a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
index 6b7abb334ca6..39f56c870051 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
@@ -353,8 +353,8 @@ static int test_cycle(unsigned int ncpus)
struct stress {
struct work_struct work;
struct ww_mutex *locks;
+ unsigned long timeout;
int nlocks;
- int nloops;
};
static int *get_random_order(int count)
@@ -398,12 +398,11 @@ static void stress_inorder_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (!order)
return;
- ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
-
do {
int contended = -1;
int n, err;
+ ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
retry:
err = 0;
for (n = 0; n < nlocks; n++) {
@@ -433,9 +432,9 @@ retry:
__func__, err);
break;
}
- } while (--stress->nloops);
- ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+ ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+ } while (!time_after(jiffies, stress->timeout));
kfree(order);
kfree(stress);
@@ -470,9 +469,9 @@ static void stress_reorder_work(struct work_struct *work)
kfree(order);
order = NULL;
- ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
-
do {
+ ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
+
list_for_each_entry(ll, &locks, link) {
err = ww_mutex_lock(ll->lock, &ctx);
if (!err)
@@ -495,9 +494,9 @@ static void stress_reorder_work(struct work_struct *work)
dummy_load(stress);
list_for_each_entry(ll, &locks, link)
ww_mutex_unlock(ll->lock);
- } while (--stress->nloops);
- ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+ ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+ } while (!time_after(jiffies, stress->timeout));
out:
list_for_each_entry_safe(ll, ln, &locks, link)
@@ -523,7 +522,7 @@ static void stress_one_work(struct work_struct *work)
__func__, err);
break;
}
- } while (--stress->nloops);
+ } while (!time_after(jiffies, stress->timeout));
kfree(stress);
}
@@ -533,7 +532,7 @@ static void stress_one_work(struct work_struct *work)
#define STRESS_ONE BIT(2)
#define STRESS_ALL (STRESS_INORDER | STRESS_REORDER | STRESS_ONE)
-static int stress(int nlocks, int nthreads, int nloops, unsigned int flags)
+static int stress(int nlocks, int nthreads, unsigned int flags)
{
struct ww_mutex *locks;
int n;
@@ -575,7 +574,7 @@ static int stress(int nlocks, int nthreads, int nloops, unsigned int flags)
INIT_WORK(&stress->work, fn);
stress->locks = locks;
stress->nlocks = nlocks;
- stress->nloops = nloops;
+ stress->timeout = jiffies + 2*HZ;
queue_work(wq, &stress->work);
nthreads--;
@@ -619,15 +618,15 @@ static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
if (ret)
return ret;
- ret = stress(16, 2*ncpus, 1<<10, STRESS_INORDER);
+ ret = stress(16, 2*ncpus, STRESS_INORDER);
if (ret)
return ret;
- ret = stress(16, 2*ncpus, 1<<10, STRESS_REORDER);
+ ret = stress(16, 2*ncpus, STRESS_REORDER);
if (ret)
return ret;
- ret = stress(4095, hweight32(STRESS_ALL)*ncpus, 1<<12, STRESS_ALL);
+ ret = stress(4095, hweight32(STRESS_ALL)*ncpus, STRESS_ALL);
if (ret)
return ret;