diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2013-09-04 17:18:19 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2013-09-04 17:18:19 +0200 |
commit | 4689550bb278cb142979c313a0d608e802c6711b (patch) | |
tree | f8776c28f1328ab4077132c636c2706f12c793aa /kernel/mutex.c | |
parent | Merge branch 'core-rcu-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kerne... (diff) | |
parent | generic-ipi/locking: Fix misleading smp_call_function_any() description (diff) | |
download | linux-4689550bb278cb142979c313a0d608e802c6711b.tar.xz linux-4689550bb278cb142979c313a0d608e802c6711b.zip |
Merge branch 'core-locking-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull core/locking changes from Ingo Molnar:
"Main changes:
- another mutex optimization, from Davidlohr Bueso
- improved lglock lockdep tracking, from Michel Lespinasse
- [ assorted smaller updates, improvements, cleanups. ]"
* 'core-locking-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
generic-ipi/locking: Fix misleading smp_call_function_any() description
hung_task debugging: Print more info when reporting the problem
mutex: Avoid label warning when !CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER
mutex: Do not unnecessarily deal with waiters
mutex: Fix/document access-once assumption in mutex_can_spin_on_owner()
lglock: Update lockdep annotations to report recursive local locks
lockdep: Introduce lock_acquire_exclusive()/shared() helper macros
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/mutex.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/mutex.c | 43 |
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 23 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/mutex.c b/kernel/mutex.c index a52ee7bb830d..6d647aedffea 100644 --- a/kernel/mutex.c +++ b/kernel/mutex.c @@ -209,11 +209,13 @@ int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner) */ static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock) { + struct task_struct *owner; int retval = 1; rcu_read_lock(); - if (lock->owner) - retval = lock->owner->on_cpu; + owner = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->owner); + if (owner) + retval = owner->on_cpu; rcu_read_unlock(); /* * if lock->owner is not set, the mutex owner may have just acquired @@ -461,7 +463,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, * performed the optimistic spinning cannot be done. */ if (ACCESS_ONCE(ww->ctx)) - break; + goto slowpath; } /* @@ -472,7 +474,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, owner = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->owner); if (owner && !mutex_spin_on_owner(lock, owner)) { mspin_unlock(MLOCK(lock), &node); - break; + goto slowpath; } if ((atomic_read(&lock->count) == 1) && @@ -499,7 +501,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, * the owner complete. */ if (!owner && (need_resched() || rt_task(task))) - break; + goto slowpath; /* * The cpu_relax() call is a compiler barrier which forces @@ -513,6 +515,10 @@ slowpath: #endif spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags); + /* once more, can we acquire the lock? */ + if (MUTEX_SHOW_NO_WAITER(lock) && (atomic_xchg(&lock->count, 0) == 1)) + goto skip_wait; + debug_mutex_lock_common(lock, &waiter); debug_mutex_add_waiter(lock, &waiter, task_thread_info(task)); @@ -520,9 +526,6 @@ slowpath: list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &lock->wait_list); waiter.task = task; - if (MUTEX_SHOW_NO_WAITER(lock) && (atomic_xchg(&lock->count, -1) == 1)) - goto done; - lock_contended(&lock->dep_map, ip); for (;;) { @@ -536,7 +539,7 @@ slowpath: * other waiters: */ if (MUTEX_SHOW_NO_WAITER(lock) && - (atomic_xchg(&lock->count, -1) == 1)) + (atomic_xchg(&lock->count, -1) == 1)) break; /* @@ -561,24 +564,25 @@ slowpath: schedule_preempt_disabled(); spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags); } + mutex_remove_waiter(lock, &waiter, current_thread_info()); + /* set it to 0 if there are no waiters left: */ + if (likely(list_empty(&lock->wait_list))) + atomic_set(&lock->count, 0); + debug_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter); -done: +skip_wait: + /* got the lock - cleanup and rejoice! */ lock_acquired(&lock->dep_map, ip); - /* got the lock - rejoice! */ - mutex_remove_waiter(lock, &waiter, current_thread_info()); mutex_set_owner(lock); if (!__builtin_constant_p(ww_ctx == NULL)) { - struct ww_mutex *ww = container_of(lock, - struct ww_mutex, - base); + struct ww_mutex *ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base); struct mutex_waiter *cur; /* * This branch gets optimized out for the common case, * and is only important for ww_mutex_lock. */ - ww_mutex_lock_acquired(ww, ww_ctx); ww->ctx = ww_ctx; @@ -592,15 +596,8 @@ done: } } - /* set it to 0 if there are no waiters left: */ - if (likely(list_empty(&lock->wait_list))) - atomic_set(&lock->count, 0); - spin_unlock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags); - - debug_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter); preempt_enable(); - return 0; err: |