summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>2024-11-13 12:00:08 +0100
committerFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>2024-11-15 22:23:50 +0100
commit812a1c3b9f7c36d9255f0d29d0a3d324e2f52321 (patch)
tree7c4e709316c88998e074416f84a013fb5d6d2bca /kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c
parentrcutorture: Avoid printing cpu=-1 for no-fault RCU boost failure (diff)
downloadlinux-812a1c3b9f7c36d9255f0d29d0a3d324e2f52321.tar.xz
linux-812a1c3b9f7c36d9255f0d29d0a3d324e2f52321.zip
rcuscale: Do a proper cleanup if kfree_scale_init() fails
A static analyzer for C, Smatch, reports and triggers below warnings: kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:1215 rcu_scale_init() warn: inconsistent returns 'global &fullstop_mutex'. The checker complains about, we do not unlock the "fullstop_mutex" mutex, in case of hitting below error path: <snip> ... if (WARN_ON_ONCE(jiffies_at_lazy_cb - jif_start < 2 * HZ)) { pr_alert("ERROR: call_rcu() CBs are not being lazy as expected!\n"); WARN_ON_ONCE(1); return -1; ^^^^^^^^^^ ... <snip> it happens because "-1" is returned right away instead of doing a proper unwinding. Fix it by jumping to "unwind" label instead of returning -1. Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/ZxfTrHuEGtgnOYWp@pc636/T/ Fixes: 084e04fff160 ("rcuscale: Add laziness and kfree tests") Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c6
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c b/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c
index 6d37596deb1f..d360fa44b234 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c
@@ -890,13 +890,15 @@ kfree_scale_init(void)
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(jiffies_at_lazy_cb - jif_start < 2 * HZ)) {
pr_alert("ERROR: call_rcu() CBs are not being lazy as expected!\n");
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
- return -1;
+ firsterr = -1;
+ goto unwind;
}
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(jiffies_at_lazy_cb - jif_start > 3 * HZ)) {
pr_alert("ERROR: call_rcu() CBs are being too lazy!\n");
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
- return -1;
+ firsterr = -1;
+ goto unwind;
}
}