diff options
author | Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | 2018-04-11 18:51:20 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | 2018-05-15 19:30:03 +0200 |
commit | bd7af8463b9fae02b4c7d7248a088ca685ef184c (patch) | |
tree | 586e0fdfa853165a282a37d485bb702c1a6fc0c1 /kernel/rcu | |
parent | rcu: Avoid __call_rcu_core() root rcu_node ->lock acquisition (diff) | |
download | linux-bd7af8463b9fae02b4c7d7248a088ca685ef184c.tar.xz linux-bd7af8463b9fae02b4c7d7248a088ca685ef184c.zip |
rcu: Switch __rcu_process_callbacks() to rcu_accelerate_cbs()
The __rcu_process_callbacks() function currently checks to see if
the current CPU needs a grace period and also if there is any other
reason to kick off a new grace period. This is one of the fail-safe
checks that has been rendered unnecessary by the changes that increase
the accuracy of rcu_gp_cleanup()'s estimate as to whether another grace
period is required. Because this particular fail-safe involved acquiring
the root rcu_node structure's ->lock, which has seen excessive contention
in real life, this fail-safe needs to go.
However, one check must remain, namely the check for newly arrived
RCU callbacks that have not yet been associated with a grace period.
One might hope that the checks in __note_gp_changes(), which is invoked
indirectly from rcu_check_quiescent_state(), would suffice, but this
function won't be invoked at all if RCU is idle. It is therefore necessary
to replace the fail-safe checks with a simpler check for newly arrived
callbacks during an RCU idle period, which is exactly what this commit
does. This change removes the final call to rcu_start_gp(), so this
function is removed as well.
Note that lockless use of cpu_needs_another_gp() is racy, but that
these races are harmless in this case. If RCU really is idle, the
values will not change, so the return value from cpu_needs_another_gp()
will be correct. If RCU is not idle, the resulting redundant call to
rcu_accelerate_cbs() will be harmless, and might even have the benefit
of reducing grace-period latency a bit.
This commit also moves interrupt disabling into the "if" statement to
improve real-time response a bit.
Reported-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/rcu')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/rcu/tree.c | 53 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 38 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c index 6396a3d10be9..fbacc486ed4c 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c @@ -2335,34 +2335,6 @@ rcu_start_gp_advanced(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp, } /* - * Similar to rcu_start_gp_advanced(), but also advance the calling CPU's - * callbacks. Note that rcu_start_gp_advanced() cannot do this because it - * is invoked indirectly from rcu_advance_cbs(), which would result in - * endless recursion -- or would do so if it wasn't for the self-deadlock - * that is encountered beforehand. - * - * Returns true if the grace-period kthread needs to be awakened. - */ -static bool rcu_start_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp) -{ - struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda); - struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp); - bool ret = false; - - /* - * If there is no grace period in progress right now, any - * callbacks we have up to this point will be satisfied by the - * next grace period. Also, advancing the callbacks reduces the - * probability of false positives from cpu_needs_another_gp() - * resulting in pointless grace periods. So, advance callbacks - * then start the grace period! - */ - ret = rcu_advance_cbs(rsp, rnp, rdp) || ret; - ret = rcu_start_gp_advanced(rsp, rnp, rdp) || ret; - return ret; -} - -/* * Report a full set of quiescent states to the specified rcu_state data * structure. Invoke rcu_gp_kthread_wake() to awaken the grace-period * kthread if another grace period is required. Whether we wake @@ -2889,22 +2861,27 @@ __rcu_process_callbacks(struct rcu_state *rsp) unsigned long flags; bool needwake; struct rcu_data *rdp = raw_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda); + struct rcu_node *rnp; WARN_ON_ONCE(!rdp->beenonline); /* Update RCU state based on any recent quiescent states. */ rcu_check_quiescent_state(rsp, rdp); - /* Does this CPU require a not-yet-started grace period? */ - local_irq_save(flags); - if (cpu_needs_another_gp(rsp, rdp)) { - raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rcu_get_root(rsp)); /* irqs disabled. */ - needwake = rcu_start_gp(rsp); - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rcu_get_root(rsp), flags); - if (needwake) - rcu_gp_kthread_wake(rsp); - } else { - local_irq_restore(flags); + /* No grace period and unregistered callbacks? */ + if (!rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp) && + rcu_segcblist_is_enabled(&rdp->cblist)) { + local_irq_save(flags); + if (rcu_segcblist_restempty(&rdp->cblist, RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL)) { + local_irq_restore(flags); + } else { + rnp = rdp->mynode; + raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp); /* irqs disabled. */ + needwake = rcu_accelerate_cbs(rsp, rnp, rdp); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags); + if (needwake) + rcu_gp_kthread_wake(rsp); + } } /* If there are callbacks ready, invoke them. */ |