diff options
author | Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | 2009-11-22 17:53:48 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2009-11-22 18:58:15 +0100 |
commit | b668c9cf3e58739dac54a1d6f42f2b4bdd980b3e (patch) | |
tree | c0165d39532a2314f8187d765f3c8ddf88b72831 /kernel/rcutree.c | |
parent | rcu: Eliminate __rcu_pending() false positives (diff) | |
download | linux-b668c9cf3e58739dac54a1d6f42f2b4bdd980b3e.tar.xz linux-b668c9cf3e58739dac54a1d6f42f2b4bdd980b3e.zip |
rcu: Fix grace-period-stall bug on large systems with CPU hotplug
When the last CPU of a given leaf rcu_node structure goes
offline, all of the tasks queued on that leaf rcu_node structure
(due to having blocked in their current RCU read-side critical
sections) are requeued onto the root rcu_node structure. This
requeuing is carried out by rcu_preempt_offline_tasks().
However, it is possible that these queued tasks are the only
thing preventing the leaf rcu_node structure from reporting a
quiescent state up the rcu_node hierarchy. Unfortunately, the
old code would fail to do this reporting, resulting in a
grace-period stall given the following sequence of events:
1. Kernel built for more than 32 CPUs on 32-bit systems or for more
than 64 CPUs on 64-bit systems, so that there is more than one
rcu_node structure. (Or CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT is artificially set
to a number smaller than CONFIG_NR_CPUS.)
2. The kernel is built with CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU.
3. A task running on a CPU associated with a given leaf rcu_node
structure blocks while in an RCU read-side critical section
-and- that CPU has not yet passed through a quiescent state
for the current RCU grace period. This will cause the task
to be queued on the leaf rcu_node's blocked_tasks[] array, in
particular, on the element of this array corresponding to the
current grace period.
4. Each of the remaining CPUs corresponding to this same leaf rcu_node
structure pass through a quiescent state. However, the task is
still in its RCU read-side critical section, so these quiescent
states cannot be reported further up the rcu_node hierarchy.
Nevertheless, all bits in the leaf rcu_node structure's ->qsmask
field are now zero.
5. Each of the remaining CPUs go offline. (The events in step
#4 and #5 can happen in any order as long as each CPU passes
through a quiescent state before going offline.)
6. When the last CPU goes offline, __rcu_offline_cpu() will invoke
rcu_preempt_offline_tasks(), which will move the task to the
root rcu_node structure, but without reporting a quiescent state
up the rcu_node hierarchy (and this failure to report a quiescent
state is the bug).
But because this leaf rcu_node structure's ->qsmask field is
already zero and its ->block_tasks[] entries are all empty,
force_quiescent_state() will skip this rcu_node structure.
Therefore, grace periods are now hung.
This patch abstracts some code out of rcu_read_unlock_special(),
calling the result task_quiet() by analogy with cpu_quiet(), and
invokes task_quiet() from both rcu_read_lock_special() and
__rcu_offline_cpu(). Invoking task_quiet() from
__rcu_offline_cpu() reports the quiescent state up the rcu_node
hierarchy, fixing the bug. This ends up requiring a separate
lock_class_key per level of the rcu_node hierarchy, which this
patch also provides.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca
Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org
Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com
Cc: niv@us.ibm.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com
LKML-Reference: <12589088301770-git-send-email->
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/rcutree.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/rcutree.c | 40 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c index 9b36d6d7fb97..b79bfcd28e95 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree.c +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ /* Data structures. */ -static struct lock_class_key rcu_root_class; +static struct lock_class_key rcu_node_class[NUM_RCU_LVLS]; #define RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(name) { \ .level = { &name.node[0] }, \ @@ -936,6 +936,7 @@ static void __rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp) { unsigned long flags; unsigned long mask; + int need_quiet = 0; struct rcu_data *rdp = rsp->rda[cpu]; struct rcu_node *rnp; @@ -949,29 +950,30 @@ static void __rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp) spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */ rnp->qsmaskinit &= ~mask; if (rnp->qsmaskinit != 0) { - spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */ + if (rnp != rdp->mynode) + spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */ break; } - - /* - * If there was a task blocking the current grace period, - * and if all CPUs have checked in, we need to propagate - * the quiescent state up the rcu_node hierarchy. But that - * is inconvenient at the moment due to deadlock issues if - * this should end the current grace period. So set the - * offlined CPU's bit in ->qsmask in order to force the - * next force_quiescent_state() invocation to clean up this - * mess in a deadlock-free manner. - */ - if (rcu_preempt_offline_tasks(rsp, rnp, rdp) && !rnp->qsmask) - rnp->qsmask |= mask; - + if (rnp == rdp->mynode) + need_quiet = rcu_preempt_offline_tasks(rsp, rnp, rdp); + else + spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */ mask = rnp->grpmask; - spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */ rnp = rnp->parent; } while (rnp != NULL); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rsp->onofflock, flags); + /* + * We still hold the leaf rcu_node structure lock here, and + * irqs are still disabled. The reason for this subterfuge is + * because invoking task_quiet() with ->onofflock held leads + * to deadlock. + */ + spin_unlock(&rsp->onofflock); /* irqs remain disabled. */ + rnp = rdp->mynode; + if (need_quiet) + task_quiet(rnp, flags); + else + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags); rcu_adopt_orphan_cbs(rsp); } @@ -1731,6 +1733,7 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp) rnp = rsp->level[i]; for (j = 0; j < rsp->levelcnt[i]; j++, rnp++) { spin_lock_init(&rnp->lock); + lockdep_set_class(&rnp->lock, &rcu_node_class[i]); rnp->gpnum = 0; rnp->qsmask = 0; rnp->qsmaskinit = 0; @@ -1753,7 +1756,6 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rnp->blocked_tasks[1]); } } - lockdep_set_class(&rcu_get_root(rsp)->lock, &rcu_root_class); } /* |