sched/cpufreq: Prepare schedutil for Energy Aware Scheduling

Schedutil requests frequency by aggregating utilization signals from
the scheduler (CFS, RT, DL, IRQ) and applying a 25% margin on top of
them. Since Energy Aware Scheduling (EAS) needs to be able to predict
the frequency requests, it needs to forecast the decisions made by the
governor.

In order to prepare the introduction of EAS, introduce
schedutil_freq_util() to centralize the aforementioned signal
aggregation and make it available to both schedutil and EAS. Since
frequency selection and energy estimation still need to deal with RT and
DL signals slightly differently, schedutil_freq_util() is called with a
different 'type' parameter in those two contexts, and returns an
aggregated utilization signal accordingly. While at it, introduce the
map_util_freq() function which is designed to make schedutil's 25%
margin usable easily for both sugov and EAS.

As EAS will be able to predict schedutil's frequency requests more
accurately than any other governor by design, it'd be sensible to make
sure EAS cannot be used without schedutil. This will be done later, once
EAS has actually been introduced.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: adharmap@codeaurora.org
Cc: chris.redpath@arm.com
Cc: currojerez@riseup.net
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Cc: edubezval@gmail.com
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: javi.merino@kernel.org
Cc: joel@joelfernandes.org
Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com
Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Cc: pkondeti@codeaurora.org
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: skannan@codeaurora.org
Cc: smuckle@google.com
Cc: srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com
Cc: thara.gopinath@linaro.org
Cc: tkjos@google.com
Cc: valentin.schneider@arm.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181203095628.11858-3-quentin.perret@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 38 insertions, 15 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 3fffad3bc8a8..90128be27712 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 
 #include "sched.h"
 
+#include <linux/sched/cpufreq.h>
 #include <trace/events/power.h>
 
 struct sugov_tunables {
@@ -167,7 +168,7 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy,
 	unsigned int freq = arch_scale_freq_invariant() ?
 				policy->cpuinfo.max_freq : policy->cur;
 
-	freq = (freq + (freq >> 2)) * util / max;
+	freq = map_util_freq(util, freq, max);
 
 	if (freq == sg_policy->cached_raw_freq && !sg_policy->need_freq_update)
 		return sg_policy->next_freq;
@@ -197,15 +198,13 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy,
  * based on the task model parameters and gives the minimal utilization
  * required to meet deadlines.
  */
-static unsigned long sugov_get_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
+unsigned long schedutil_freq_util(int cpu, unsigned long util_cfs,
+				  unsigned long max, enum schedutil_type type)
 {
-	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu);
-	unsigned long util, irq, max;
+	unsigned long dl_util, util, irq;
+	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 
-	sg_cpu->max = max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, sg_cpu->cpu);
-	sg_cpu->bw_dl = cpu_bw_dl(rq);
-
-	if (rt_rq_is_runnable(&rq->rt))
+	if (type == FREQUENCY_UTIL && rt_rq_is_runnable(&rq->rt))
 		return max;
 
 	/*
@@ -223,22 +222,31 @@ static unsigned long sugov_get_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
 	 * utilization (PELT windows are synchronized) we can directly add them
 	 * to obtain the CPU's actual utilization.
 	 */
-	util = cpu_util_cfs(rq);
+	util = util_cfs;
 	util += cpu_util_rt(rq);
 
+	dl_util = cpu_util_dl(rq);
+
 	/*
-	 * We do not make cpu_util_dl() a permanent part of this sum because we
-	 * want to use cpu_bw_dl() later on, but we need to check if the
-	 * CFS+RT+DL sum is saturated (ie. no idle time) such that we select
-	 * f_max when there is no idle time.
+	 * For frequency selection we do not make cpu_util_dl() a permanent part
+	 * of this sum because we want to use cpu_bw_dl() later on, but we need
+	 * to check if the CFS+RT+DL sum is saturated (ie. no idle time) such
+	 * that we select f_max when there is no idle time.
 	 *
 	 * NOTE: numerical errors or stop class might cause us to not quite hit
 	 * saturation when we should -- something for later.
 	 */
-	if ((util + cpu_util_dl(rq)) >= max)
+	if (util + dl_util >= max)
 		return max;
 
 	/*
+	 * OTOH, for energy computation we need the estimated running time, so
+	 * include util_dl and ignore dl_bw.
+	 */
+	if (type == ENERGY_UTIL)
+		util += dl_util;
+
+	/*
 	 * There is still idle time; further improve the number by using the
 	 * irq metric. Because IRQ/steal time is hidden from the task clock we
 	 * need to scale the task numbers:
@@ -260,7 +268,22 @@ static unsigned long sugov_get_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
 	 * bw_dl as requested freq. However, cpufreq is not yet ready for such
 	 * an interface. So, we only do the latter for now.
 	 */
-	return min(max, util + sg_cpu->bw_dl);
+	if (type == FREQUENCY_UTIL)
+		util += cpu_bw_dl(rq);
+
+	return min(max, util);
+}
+
+static unsigned long sugov_get_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
+{
+	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu);
+	unsigned long util = cpu_util_cfs(rq);
+	unsigned long max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, sg_cpu->cpu);
+
+	sg_cpu->max = max;
+	sg_cpu->bw_dl = cpu_bw_dl(rq);
+
+	return schedutil_freq_util(sg_cpu->cpu, util, max, FREQUENCY_UTIL);
 }
 
 /**