Merge branch 'sched-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull scheduler fixes from Ingo Molnar:
 "Various scheduler fixes all over the place: three SCHED_DL fixes,
  three sched/numa fixes, two generic race fixes and a comment fix"

* 'sched-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  sched/dl: Fix preemption checks
  sched: Update comments for CLONE_NEWNS
  sched: stop the unbound recursion in preempt_schedule_context()
  sched/fair: Fix division by zero sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_size
  sched/fair: Care divide error in update_task_scan_period()
  sched/numa: Fix unsafe get_task_struct() in task_numa_assign()
  sched/deadline: Fix races between rt_mutex_setprio() and dl_task_timer()
  sched/deadline: Don't replenish from a !SCHED_DEADLINE entity
  sched: Fix race between task_group and sched_task_group

1 files changed, 32 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 256e577faf1b..5285332392d5 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -518,12 +518,20 @@ again:
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * We need to take care of a possible races here. In fact, the
-	 * task might have changed its scheduling policy to something
-	 * different from SCHED_DEADLINE or changed its reservation
-	 * parameters (through sched_setattr()).
+	 * We need to take care of several possible races here:
+	 *
+	 *   - the task might have changed its scheduling policy
+	 *     to something different than SCHED_DEADLINE
+	 *   - the task might have changed its reservation parameters
+	 *     (through sched_setattr())
+	 *   - the task might have been boosted by someone else and
+	 *     might be in the boosting/deboosting path
+	 *
+	 * In all this cases we bail out, as the task is already
+	 * in the runqueue or is going to be enqueued back anyway.
 	 */
-	if (!dl_task(p) || dl_se->dl_new)
+	if (!dl_task(p) || dl_se->dl_new ||
+	    dl_se->dl_boosted || !dl_se->dl_throttled)
 		goto unlock;
 
 	sched_clock_tick();
@@ -532,7 +540,7 @@ again:
 	dl_se->dl_yielded = 0;
 	if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) {
 		enqueue_task_dl(rq, p, ENQUEUE_REPLENISH);
-		if (task_has_dl_policy(rq->curr))
+		if (dl_task(rq->curr))
 			check_preempt_curr_dl(rq, p, 0);
 		else
 			resched_curr(rq);
@@ -847,8 +855,19 @@ static void enqueue_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 	 * smaller than our one... OTW we keep our runtime and
 	 * deadline.
 	 */
-	if (pi_task && p->dl.dl_boosted && dl_prio(pi_task->normal_prio))
+	if (pi_task && p->dl.dl_boosted && dl_prio(pi_task->normal_prio)) {
 		pi_se = &pi_task->dl;
+	} else if (!dl_prio(p->normal_prio)) {
+		/*
+		 * Special case in which we have a !SCHED_DEADLINE task
+		 * that is going to be deboosted, but exceedes its
+		 * runtime while doing so. No point in replenishing
+		 * it, as it's going to return back to its original
+		 * scheduling class after this.
+		 */
+		BUG_ON(!p->dl.dl_boosted || flags != ENQUEUE_REPLENISH);
+		return;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * If p is throttled, we do nothing. In fact, if it exhausted
@@ -1607,8 +1626,12 @@ static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 			/* Only reschedule if pushing failed */
 			check_resched = 0;
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
-		if (check_resched && task_has_dl_policy(rq->curr))
-			check_preempt_curr_dl(rq, p, 0);
+		if (check_resched) {
+			if (dl_task(rq->curr))
+				check_preempt_curr_dl(rq, p, 0);
+			else
+				resched_curr(rq);
+		}
 	}
 }