diff options
author | Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> | 2015-11-05 21:56:23 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2015-11-23 09:37:54 +0100 |
commit | 51170840fe91dfca10fd533b303ea39b2524782a (patch) | |
tree | ecc5a035c11c0ce1f7a5891c6d0331a39a5293d1 /kernel/sched/fair.c | |
parent | sched/fair: Consider missed ticks in NOHZ_FULL in update_cpu_load_nohz() (diff) | |
download | linux-51170840fe91dfca10fd533b303ea39b2524782a.tar.xz linux-51170840fe91dfca10fd533b303ea39b2524782a.zip |
sched/numa: Cap PTE scanning overhead to 3% of run time
There is a fundamental mismatch between the runtime based NUMA scanning
at the task level, and the wall clock time NUMA scanning at the mm level.
On a severely overloaded system, with very large processes, this mismatch
can cause the system to spend all of its time in change_prot_numa().
This can happen if the task spends at least two ticks in change_prot_numa(),
and only gets two ticks of CPU time in the real time between two scan
intervals of the mm.
This patch ensures that a task never spends more than 3% of run
time scanning PTEs. It does that by ensuring that in-between
task_numa_work() runs, the task spends at least 32x as much time on
other things than it did on task_numa_work().
This is done stochastically: if a timer tick happens, or the task
gets rescheduled during task_numa_work(), we delay a future run of
task_numa_work() until the task has spent at least 32x the amount of
CPU time doing something else, as it spent inside task_numa_work().
The longer task_numa_work() takes, the more likely it is this happens.
If task_numa_work() takes very little time, chances are low that that
code will do anything, but we will not care.
Reported-and-tested-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1446756983-28173-3-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched/fair.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/fair.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 309b1d551f25..95b944ecf7e4 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -2155,6 +2155,7 @@ void task_numa_work(struct callback_head *work) unsigned long migrate, next_scan, now = jiffies; struct task_struct *p = current; struct mm_struct *mm = p->mm; + u64 runtime = p->se.sum_exec_runtime; struct vm_area_struct *vma; unsigned long start, end; unsigned long nr_pte_updates = 0; @@ -2277,6 +2278,17 @@ out: else reset_ptenuma_scan(p); up_read(&mm->mmap_sem); + + /* + * Make sure tasks use at least 32x as much time to run other code + * than they used here, to limit NUMA PTE scanning overhead to 3% max. + * Usually update_task_scan_period slows down scanning enough; on an + * overloaded system we need to limit overhead on a per task basis. + */ + if (unlikely(p->se.sum_exec_runtime != runtime)) { + u64 diff = p->se.sum_exec_runtime - runtime; + p->node_stamp += 32 * diff; + } } /* |