summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/sched/fair.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>2012-01-09 11:28:35 +0100
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2012-05-17 13:48:56 +0200
commit8e7fbcbc22c12414bcc9dfdd683637f58fb32759 (patch)
treea438021ddeadddd8f0745293aeb8c80dbe3c999c /kernel/sched/fair.c
parentMerge branch 'sched/urgent' into sched/core (diff)
downloadlinux-8e7fbcbc22c12414bcc9dfdd683637f58fb32759.tar.xz
linux-8e7fbcbc22c12414bcc9dfdd683637f58fb32759.zip
sched: Remove stale power aware scheduling remnants and dysfunctional knobs
It's been broken forever (i.e. it's not scheduling in a power aware fashion), as reported by Suresh and others sending patches, and nobody cares enough to fix it properly ... so remove it to make space free for something better. There's various problems with the code as it stands today, first and foremost the user interface which is bound to topology levels and has multiple values per level. This results in a state explosion which the administrator or distro needs to master and almost nobody does. Furthermore large configuration state spaces aren't good, it means the thing doesn't just work right because it's either under so many impossibe to meet constraints, or even if there's an achievable state workloads have to be aware of it precisely and can never meet it for dynamic workloads. So pushing this kind of decision to user-space was a bad idea even with a single knob - it's exponentially worse with knobs on every node of the topology. There is a proposal to replace the user interface with a single 3 state knob: sched_balance_policy := { performance, power, auto } where 'auto' would be the preferred default which looks at things like Battery/AC mode and possible cpufreq state or whatever the hw exposes to show us power use expectations - but there's been no progress on it in the past many months. Aside from that, the actual implementation of the various knobs is known to be broken. There have been sporadic attempts at fixing things but these always stop short of reaching a mergable state. Therefore this wholesale removal with the hopes of spurring people who care to come forward once again and work on a coherent replacement. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1326104915.2442.53.camel@twins Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched/fair.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/sched/fair.c275
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 273 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 0b42f4487329..940e6d17cf96 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2721,7 +2721,7 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int wake_flags)
* If power savings logic is enabled for a domain, see if we
* are not overloaded, if so, don't balance wider.
*/
- if (tmp->flags & (SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE|SD_PREFER_LOCAL)) {
+ if (tmp->flags & (SD_PREFER_LOCAL)) {
unsigned long power = 0;
unsigned long nr_running = 0;
unsigned long capacity;
@@ -2734,9 +2734,6 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int wake_flags)
capacity = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(power, SCHED_POWER_SCALE);
- if (tmp->flags & SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE)
- nr_running /= 2;
-
if (nr_running < capacity)
want_sd = 0;
}
@@ -3435,14 +3432,6 @@ struct sd_lb_stats {
unsigned int busiest_group_weight;
int group_imb; /* Is there imbalance in this sd */
-#if defined(CONFIG_SCHED_MC) || defined(CONFIG_SCHED_SMT)
- int power_savings_balance; /* Is powersave balance needed for this sd */
- struct sched_group *group_min; /* Least loaded group in sd */
- struct sched_group *group_leader; /* Group which relieves group_min */
- unsigned long min_load_per_task; /* load_per_task in group_min */
- unsigned long leader_nr_running; /* Nr running of group_leader */
- unsigned long min_nr_running; /* Nr running of group_min */
-#endif
};
/*
@@ -3486,147 +3475,6 @@ static inline int get_sd_load_idx(struct sched_domain *sd,
return load_idx;
}
-
-#if defined(CONFIG_SCHED_MC) || defined(CONFIG_SCHED_SMT)
-/**
- * init_sd_power_savings_stats - Initialize power savings statistics for
- * the given sched_domain, during load balancing.
- *
- * @sd: Sched domain whose power-savings statistics are to be initialized.
- * @sds: Variable containing the statistics for sd.
- * @idle: Idle status of the CPU at which we're performing load-balancing.
- */
-static inline void init_sd_power_savings_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
- struct sd_lb_stats *sds, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
-{
- /*
- * Busy processors will not participate in power savings
- * balance.
- */
- if (idle == CPU_NOT_IDLE || !(sd->flags & SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE))
- sds->power_savings_balance = 0;
- else {
- sds->power_savings_balance = 1;
- sds->min_nr_running = ULONG_MAX;
- sds->leader_nr_running = 0;
- }
-}
-
-/**
- * update_sd_power_savings_stats - Update the power saving stats for a
- * sched_domain while performing load balancing.
- *
- * @group: sched_group belonging to the sched_domain under consideration.
- * @sds: Variable containing the statistics of the sched_domain
- * @local_group: Does group contain the CPU for which we're performing
- * load balancing ?
- * @sgs: Variable containing the statistics of the group.
- */
-static inline void update_sd_power_savings_stats(struct sched_group *group,
- struct sd_lb_stats *sds, int local_group, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
-{
-
- if (!sds->power_savings_balance)
- return;
-
- /*
- * If the local group is idle or completely loaded
- * no need to do power savings balance at this domain
- */
- if (local_group && (sds->this_nr_running >= sgs->group_capacity ||
- !sds->this_nr_running))
- sds->power_savings_balance = 0;
-
- /*
- * If a group is already running at full capacity or idle,
- * don't include that group in power savings calculations
- */
- if (!sds->power_savings_balance ||
- sgs->sum_nr_running >= sgs->group_capacity ||
- !sgs->sum_nr_running)
- return;
-
- /*
- * Calculate the group which has the least non-idle load.
- * This is the group from where we need to pick up the load
- * for saving power
- */
- if ((sgs->sum_nr_running < sds->min_nr_running) ||
- (sgs->sum_nr_running == sds->min_nr_running &&
- group_first_cpu(group) > group_first_cpu(sds->group_min))) {
- sds->group_min = group;
- sds->min_nr_running = sgs->sum_nr_running;
- sds->min_load_per_task = sgs->sum_weighted_load /
- sgs->sum_nr_running;
- }
-
- /*
- * Calculate the group which is almost near its
- * capacity but still has some space to pick up some load
- * from other group and save more power
- */
- if (sgs->sum_nr_running + 1 > sgs->group_capacity)
- return;
-
- if (sgs->sum_nr_running > sds->leader_nr_running ||
- (sgs->sum_nr_running == sds->leader_nr_running &&
- group_first_cpu(group) < group_first_cpu(sds->group_leader))) {
- sds->group_leader = group;
- sds->leader_nr_running = sgs->sum_nr_running;
- }
-}
-
-/**
- * check_power_save_busiest_group - see if there is potential for some power-savings balance
- * @env: load balance environment
- * @sds: Variable containing the statistics of the sched_domain
- * under consideration.
- *
- * Description:
- * Check if we have potential to perform some power-savings balance.
- * If yes, set the busiest group to be the least loaded group in the
- * sched_domain, so that it's CPUs can be put to idle.
- *
- * Returns 1 if there is potential to perform power-savings balance.
- * Else returns 0.
- */
-static inline
-int check_power_save_busiest_group(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
-{
- if (!sds->power_savings_balance)
- return 0;
-
- if (sds->this != sds->group_leader ||
- sds->group_leader == sds->group_min)
- return 0;
-
- env->imbalance = sds->min_load_per_task;
- sds->busiest = sds->group_min;
-
- return 1;
-
-}
-#else /* CONFIG_SCHED_MC || CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
-static inline void init_sd_power_savings_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
- struct sd_lb_stats *sds, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
-{
- return;
-}
-
-static inline void update_sd_power_savings_stats(struct sched_group *group,
- struct sd_lb_stats *sds, int local_group, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
-{
- return;
-}
-
-static inline
-int check_power_save_busiest_group(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_MC || CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
-
-
unsigned long default_scale_freq_power(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
{
return SCHED_POWER_SCALE;
@@ -3932,7 +3780,6 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
if (child && child->flags & SD_PREFER_SIBLING)
prefer_sibling = 1;
- init_sd_power_savings_stats(env->sd, sds, env->idle);
load_idx = get_sd_load_idx(env->sd, env->idle);
do {
@@ -3981,7 +3828,6 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
sds->group_imb = sgs.group_imb;
}
- update_sd_power_savings_stats(sg, sds, local_group, &sgs);
sg = sg->next;
} while (sg != env->sd->groups);
}
@@ -4276,12 +4122,6 @@ force_balance:
return sds.busiest;
out_balanced:
- /*
- * There is no obvious imbalance. But check if we can do some balancing
- * to save power.
- */
- if (check_power_save_busiest_group(env, &sds))
- return sds.busiest;
ret:
env->imbalance = 0;
return NULL;
@@ -4359,28 +4199,6 @@ static int need_active_balance(struct lb_env *env)
*/
if ((sd->flags & SD_ASYM_PACKING) && env->src_cpu > env->dst_cpu)
return 1;
-
- /*
- * The only task running in a non-idle cpu can be moved to this
- * cpu in an attempt to completely freeup the other CPU
- * package.
- *
- * The package power saving logic comes from
- * find_busiest_group(). If there are no imbalance, then
- * f_b_g() will return NULL. However when sched_mc={1,2} then
- * f_b_g() will select a group from which a running task may be
- * pulled to this cpu in order to make the other package idle.
- * If there is no opportunity to make a package idle and if
- * there are no imbalance, then f_b_g() will return NULL and no
- * action will be taken in load_balance_newidle().
- *
- * Under normal task pull operation due to imbalance, there
- * will be more than one task in the source run queue and
- * move_tasks() will succeed. ld_moved will be true and this
- * active balance code will not be triggered.
- */
- if (sched_mc_power_savings < POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP)
- return 0;
}
return unlikely(sd->nr_balance_failed > sd->cache_nice_tries+2);
@@ -4700,104 +4518,15 @@ static struct {
unsigned long next_balance; /* in jiffy units */
} nohz ____cacheline_aligned;
-#if defined(CONFIG_SCHED_MC) || defined(CONFIG_SCHED_SMT)
-/**
- * lowest_flag_domain - Return lowest sched_domain containing flag.
- * @cpu: The cpu whose lowest level of sched domain is to
- * be returned.
- * @flag: The flag to check for the lowest sched_domain
- * for the given cpu.
- *
- * Returns the lowest sched_domain of a cpu which contains the given flag.
- */
-static inline struct sched_domain *lowest_flag_domain(int cpu, int flag)
-{
- struct sched_domain *sd;
-
- for_each_domain(cpu, sd)
- if (sd->flags & flag)
- break;
-
- return sd;
-}
-
-/**
- * for_each_flag_domain - Iterates over sched_domains containing the flag.
- * @cpu: The cpu whose domains we're iterating over.
- * @sd: variable holding the value of the power_savings_sd
- * for cpu.
- * @flag: The flag to filter the sched_domains to be iterated.
- *
- * Iterates over all the scheduler domains for a given cpu that has the 'flag'
- * set, starting from the lowest sched_domain to the highest.
- */
-#define for_each_flag_domain(cpu, sd, flag) \
- for (sd = lowest_flag_domain(cpu, flag); \
- (sd && (sd->flags & flag)); sd = sd->parent)
-
-/**
- * find_new_ilb - Finds the optimum idle load balancer for nomination.
- * @cpu: The cpu which is nominating a new idle_load_balancer.
- *
- * Returns: Returns the id of the idle load balancer if it exists,
- * Else, returns >= nr_cpu_ids.
- *
- * This algorithm picks the idle load balancer such that it belongs to a
- * semi-idle powersavings sched_domain. The idea is to try and avoid
- * completely idle packages/cores just for the purpose of idle load balancing
- * when there are other idle cpu's which are better suited for that job.
- */
-static int find_new_ilb(int cpu)
+static inline int find_new_ilb(int call_cpu)
{
int ilb = cpumask_first(nohz.idle_cpus_mask);
- struct sched_group *ilbg;
- struct sched_domain *sd;
- /*
- * Have idle load balancer selection from semi-idle packages only
- * when power-aware load balancing is enabled
- */
- if (!(sched_smt_power_savings || sched_mc_power_savings))
- goto out_done;
-
- /*
- * Optimize for the case when we have no idle CPUs or only one
- * idle CPU. Don't walk the sched_domain hierarchy in such cases
- */
- if (cpumask_weight(nohz.idle_cpus_mask) < 2)
- goto out_done;
-
- rcu_read_lock();
- for_each_flag_domain(cpu, sd, SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE) {
- ilbg = sd->groups;
-
- do {
- if (ilbg->group_weight !=
- atomic_read(&ilbg->sgp->nr_busy_cpus)) {
- ilb = cpumask_first_and(nohz.idle_cpus_mask,
- sched_group_cpus(ilbg));
- goto unlock;
- }
-
- ilbg = ilbg->next;
-
- } while (ilbg != sd->groups);
- }
-unlock:
- rcu_read_unlock();
-
-out_done:
if (ilb < nr_cpu_ids && idle_cpu(ilb))
return ilb;
return nr_cpu_ids;
}
-#else /* (CONFIG_SCHED_MC || CONFIG_SCHED_SMT) */
-static inline int find_new_ilb(int call_cpu)
-{
- return nr_cpu_ids;
-}
-#endif
/*
* Kick a CPU to do the nohz balancing, if it is time for it. We pick the