diff options
author | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2015-02-11 05:01:52 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2015-02-13 23:49:36 +0100 |
commit | affe3e85ae78507cc953f3f700e0644e50844cff (patch) | |
tree | 7f29d6565dc433a42492187537d7473b192652f1 /kernel/time | |
parent | PM / sleep: Re-implement suspend-to-idle handling (diff) | |
download | linux-affe3e85ae78507cc953f3f700e0644e50844cff.tar.xz linux-affe3e85ae78507cc953f3f700e0644e50844cff.zip |
timekeeping: Pass readout base to update_fast_timekeeper()
Modify update_fast_timekeeper() to take a struct tk_read_base
pointer as its argument (instead of a struct timekeeper pointer)
and update its kerneldoc comment to reflect that.
That will allow a struct tk_read_base that is not part of a
struct timekeeper to be passed to it in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/time')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c index b124af259800..abf08f4366c1 100644 --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c @@ -230,9 +230,7 @@ static inline s64 timekeeping_get_ns_raw(struct timekeeper *tk) /** * update_fast_timekeeper - Update the fast and NMI safe monotonic timekeeper. - * @tk: The timekeeper from which we take the update - * @tkf: The fast timekeeper to update - * @tbase: The time base for the fast timekeeper (mono/raw) + * @tkr: Timekeeping readout base from which we take the update * * We want to use this from any context including NMI and tracing / * instrumenting the timekeeping code itself. @@ -244,11 +242,11 @@ static inline s64 timekeeping_get_ns_raw(struct timekeeper *tk) * smp_wmb(); <- Ensure that the last base[1] update is visible * tkf->seq++; * smp_wmb(); <- Ensure that the seqcount update is visible - * update(tkf->base[0], tk); + * update(tkf->base[0], tkr); * smp_wmb(); <- Ensure that the base[0] update is visible * tkf->seq++; * smp_wmb(); <- Ensure that the seqcount update is visible - * update(tkf->base[1], tk); + * update(tkf->base[1], tkr); * * The reader side does: * @@ -269,7 +267,7 @@ static inline s64 timekeeping_get_ns_raw(struct timekeeper *tk) * slightly wrong timestamp (a few nanoseconds). See * @ktime_get_mono_fast_ns. */ -static void update_fast_timekeeper(struct timekeeper *tk) +static void update_fast_timekeeper(struct tk_read_base *tkr) { struct tk_read_base *base = tk_fast_mono.base; @@ -277,7 +275,7 @@ static void update_fast_timekeeper(struct timekeeper *tk) raw_write_seqcount_latch(&tk_fast_mono.seq); /* Update base[0] */ - memcpy(base, &tk->tkr, sizeof(*base)); + memcpy(base, tkr, sizeof(*base)); /* Force readers back to base[0] */ raw_write_seqcount_latch(&tk_fast_mono.seq); @@ -462,7 +460,7 @@ static void timekeeping_update(struct timekeeper *tk, unsigned int action) memcpy(&shadow_timekeeper, &tk_core.timekeeper, sizeof(tk_core.timekeeper)); - update_fast_timekeeper(tk); + update_fast_timekeeper(&tk->tkr); } /** |