diff options
author | Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> | 2014-04-18 17:04:16 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2014-04-18 17:04:16 +0200 |
commit | 4d595b866d2c653dc90a492b9973a834eabfa354 (patch) | |
tree | 6b9a9af0eb01436a3967eff0a5c916e80cf0ef5f /kernel/workqueue.c | |
parent | workqueue: fix bugs in wq_update_unbound_numa() failure path (diff) | |
download | linux-4d595b866d2c653dc90a492b9973a834eabfa354.tar.xz linux-4d595b866d2c653dc90a492b9973a834eabfa354.zip |
workqueue: make rescuer_thread() empty wq->maydays list before exiting
After a @pwq is scheduled for emergency execution, other workers may
consume the affectd work items before the rescuer gets to them. This
means that a workqueue many have pwqs queued on @wq->maydays list
while not having any work item pending or in-flight. If
destroy_workqueue() executes in such condition, the rescuer may exit
without emptying @wq->maydays.
This currently doesn't cause any actual harm. destroy_workqueue() can
safely destroy all the involved data structures whether @wq->maydays
is populated or not as nobody access the list once the rescuer exits.
However, this is nasty and makes future development difficult. Let's
update rescuer_thread() so that it empties @wq->maydays after seeing
should_stop to guarantee that the list is empty on rescuer exit.
tj: Updated comment and patch description.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.10+
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/workqueue.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/workqueue.c | 21 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 3150b217c936..6ba0c6054224 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -2398,6 +2398,7 @@ static int rescuer_thread(void *__rescuer) struct worker *rescuer = __rescuer; struct workqueue_struct *wq = rescuer->rescue_wq; struct list_head *scheduled = &rescuer->scheduled; + bool should_stop; set_user_nice(current, RESCUER_NICE_LEVEL); @@ -2409,11 +2410,15 @@ static int rescuer_thread(void *__rescuer) repeat: set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); - if (kthread_should_stop()) { - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); - rescuer->task->flags &= ~PF_WQ_WORKER; - return 0; - } + /* + * By the time the rescuer is requested to stop, the workqueue + * shouldn't have any work pending, but @wq->maydays may still have + * pwq(s) queued. This can happen by non-rescuer workers consuming + * all the work items before the rescuer got to them. Go through + * @wq->maydays processing before acting on should_stop so that the + * list is always empty on exit. + */ + should_stop = kthread_should_stop(); /* see whether any pwq is asking for help */ spin_lock_irq(&wq_mayday_lock); @@ -2459,6 +2464,12 @@ repeat: spin_unlock_irq(&wq_mayday_lock); + if (should_stop) { + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); + rescuer->task->flags &= ~PF_WQ_WORKER; + return 0; + } + /* rescuers should never participate in concurrency management */ WARN_ON_ONCE(!(rescuer->flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING)); schedule(); |