diff options
author | Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com> | 2021-08-17 03:32:38 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2021-08-17 19:49:10 +0200 |
commit | d812796eb3906424cd3c0eea530983961e2f88bd (patch) | |
tree | ffb809babfa728dd5cef8a0b9106c0d9a04d5d4b /kernel/workqueue.c | |
parent | workqueue: Mark barrier work with WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE (diff) | |
download | linux-d812796eb3906424cd3c0eea530983961e2f88bd.tar.xz linux-d812796eb3906424cd3c0eea530983961e2f88bd.zip |
workqueue: Assign a color to barrier work items
There was no strong reason to or not to flush barrier work items in
flush_workqueue(). And we have to make barrier work items not participate
in nr_active so we had been using WORK_NO_COLOR for them which also makes
them can't be flushed by flush_workqueue().
And the users of flush_workqueue() often do not intend to wait barrier work
items issued by flush_work(). That made the choice sound perfect.
But barrier work items have reference to internal structure (pool_workqueue)
and the worker thread[s] is/are still busy for the workqueue user when the
barrrier work items are not done. So it is reasonable to make flush_workqueue()
also watch for flush_work() to make it more robust.
And a problem[1] reported by Li Zhe shows that we need such robustness.
The warning logs are listed below:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 19336 at kernel/workqueue.c:4430 destroy_workqueue+0x11a/0x2f0
*****
destroy_workqueue: test_workqueue9 has the following busy pwq
pwq 4: cpus=2 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=0/1 refcnt=2
in-flight: 5658:wq_barrier_func
Showing busy workqueues and worker pools:
*****
It shows that even after drain_workqueue() returns, the barrier work item
is still in flight and the pwq (and a worker) is still busy on it.
The problem is caused by flush_workqueue() not watching flush_work():
Thread A Worker
/* normal work item with linked */
process_scheduled_works()
destroy_workqueue() process_one_work()
drain_workqueue() /* run normal work item */
/-- pwq_dec_nr_in_flight()
flush_workqueue() <---/
/* the last normal work item is done */
sanity_check process_one_work()
/-- raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock)
raw_spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock) <-/ /* maybe preempt */
*WARNING* wq_barrier_func()
/* maybe preempt by cond_resched() */
Thread A can get the pool lock after the Worker unlocks the pool lock before
running wq_barrier_func(). And if there is any preemption happen around
wq_barrier_func(), destroy_workqueue()'s sanity check is more likely to
get the lock and catch it. (Note: preemption is not necessary to cause the bug,
the unlocking is enough to possibly trigger the WARNING.)
A simple solution might be just executing all linked barrier work items
once without releasing pool lock after the head work item's
pwq_dec_nr_in_flight(). But this solution has two problems:
1) the head work item might also be barrier work item when the user-queued
work item is cancelled. For example:
thread 1: thread 2:
queue_work(wq, &my_work)
flush_work(&my_work)
cancel_work_sync(&my_work);
/* Neiter my_work nor the barrier work is scheduled. */
destroy_workqueue(wq);
/* This is an easier way to catch the WARNING. */
2) there might be too much linked barrier work items and running them
all once without releasing pool lock just causes trouble.
The only solution is to make flush_workqueue() aslo watch barrier work
items. So we have to assign a color to these barrier work items which
is the color of the head (user-queued) work item.
Assigning a color doesn't cause any problem in ative management, because
the prvious patch made barrier work items not participate in nr_active
via WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE rather than reliance on the (old) WORK_NO_COLOR.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210812083814.32453-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com/
Reported-by: Li Zhe <lizhe.67@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/workqueue.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/workqueue.c | 20 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 6657bcbd2064..33a6b4a2443d 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -1197,10 +1197,6 @@ static void pwq_dec_nr_in_flight(struct pool_workqueue *pwq, unsigned long work_ } } - /* uncolored work items don't participate in flushing */ - if (color == WORK_NO_COLOR) - goto out_put; - pwq->nr_in_flight[color]--; /* is flush in progress and are we at the flushing tip? */ @@ -1307,7 +1303,7 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work, bool is_dwork, * canceled (see the comments in insert_wq_barrier()). * * An inactive work item cannot be grabbed directly because - * it might have linked NO_COLOR work items which, if left + * it might have linked barrier work items which, if left * on the inactive_works list, will confuse pwq->nr_active * management later on and cause stall. Make sure the work * item is activated before grabbing. @@ -2234,6 +2230,7 @@ __acquires(&pool->lock) worker->current_func = work->func; worker->current_pwq = pwq; work_data = *work_data_bits(work); + worker->current_color = get_work_color(work_data); /* * Record wq name for cmdline and debug reporting, may get @@ -2339,6 +2336,7 @@ __acquires(&pool->lock) worker->current_work = NULL; worker->current_func = NULL; worker->current_pwq = NULL; + worker->current_color = INT_MAX; pwq_dec_nr_in_flight(pwq, work_data); } @@ -2682,7 +2680,8 @@ static void insert_wq_barrier(struct pool_workqueue *pwq, struct wq_barrier *barr, struct work_struct *target, struct worker *worker) { - unsigned int work_flags = work_color_to_flags(WORK_NO_COLOR); + unsigned int work_flags = 0; + unsigned int work_color; struct list_head *head; /* @@ -2705,17 +2704,22 @@ static void insert_wq_barrier(struct pool_workqueue *pwq, * If @target is currently being executed, schedule the * barrier to the worker; otherwise, put it after @target. */ - if (worker) + if (worker) { head = worker->scheduled.next; - else { + work_color = worker->current_color; + } else { unsigned long *bits = work_data_bits(target); head = target->entry.next; /* there can already be other linked works, inherit and set */ work_flags |= *bits & WORK_STRUCT_LINKED; + work_color = get_work_color(*bits); __set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_LINKED_BIT, bits); } + pwq->nr_in_flight[work_color]++; + work_flags |= work_color_to_flags(work_color); + debug_work_activate(&barr->work); insert_work(pwq, &barr->work, head, work_flags); } |