diff options
| author | Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> | 2020-03-28 00:29:59 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2020-04-08 11:35:20 +0200 |
| commit | 62849a9612924a655c67cf6962920544aa5c20db (patch) | |
| tree | f8acbf5978aa3bc2df5eb7f1122426bfe843204c /kernel/workqueue.c | |
| parent | sched/fair: Fix negative imbalance in imbalance calculation (diff) | |
| download | linux-62849a9612924a655c67cf6962920544aa5c20db.tar.xz linux-62849a9612924a655c67cf6962920544aa5c20db.zip | |
workqueue: Remove the warning in wq_worker_sleeping()
The kernel test robot triggered a warning with the following race:
task-ctx A interrupt-ctx B
worker
-> process_one_work()
-> work_item()
-> schedule();
-> sched_submit_work()
-> wq_worker_sleeping()
-> ->sleeping = 1
atomic_dec_and_test(nr_running)
__schedule(); *interrupt*
async_page_fault()
-> local_irq_enable();
-> schedule();
-> sched_submit_work()
-> wq_worker_sleeping()
-> if (WARN_ON(->sleeping)) return
-> __schedule()
-> sched_update_worker()
-> wq_worker_running()
-> atomic_inc(nr_running);
-> ->sleeping = 0;
-> sched_update_worker()
-> wq_worker_running()
if (!->sleeping) return
In this context the warning is pointless everything is fine.
An interrupt before wq_worker_sleeping() will perform the ->sleeping
assignment (0 -> 1 > 0) twice.
An interrupt after wq_worker_sleeping() will trigger the warning and
nr_running will be decremented (by A) and incremented once (only by B, A
will skip it). This is the case until the ->sleeping is zeroed again in
wq_worker_running().
Remove the WARN statement because this condition may happen. Document
that preemption around wq_worker_sleeping() needs to be disabled to
protect ->sleeping and not just as an optimisation.
Fixes: 6d25be5782e48 ("sched/core, workqueues: Distangle worker accounting from rq lock")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200327074308.GY11705@shao2-debian
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/workqueue.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/workqueue.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 3816a18c251e..891ccad5f271 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -858,7 +858,8 @@ void wq_worker_running(struct task_struct *task) * @task: task going to sleep * * This function is called from schedule() when a busy worker is - * going to sleep. + * going to sleep. Preemption needs to be disabled to protect ->sleeping + * assignment. */ void wq_worker_sleeping(struct task_struct *task) { @@ -875,7 +876,8 @@ void wq_worker_sleeping(struct task_struct *task) pool = worker->pool; - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(worker->sleeping)) + /* Return if preempted before wq_worker_running() was reached */ + if (worker->sleeping) return; worker->sleeping = 1; |