diff options
author | Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> | 2014-05-20 00:49:45 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2014-06-05 11:52:00 +0200 |
commit | 51f2176d74ace4c3f58579a605ef5a9720befb00 (patch) | |
tree | 3c4f8405eacae93ef43707c2d335f8a12212eaeb /kernel | |
parent | sched/numa: Decay ->wakee_flips instead of zeroing (diff) | |
download | linux-51f2176d74ace4c3f58579a605ef5a9720befb00.tar.xz linux-51f2176d74ace4c3f58579a605ef5a9720befb00.zip |
sched/fair: Fix unlocked reads of some cfs_b->quota/period
sched_cfs_period_timer() reads cfs_b->period without locks before calling
do_sched_cfs_period_timer(), and similarly unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs()
would read cfs_b->period without the right lock. Thus a simultaneous
change of bandwidth could cause corruption on any platform where ktime_t
or u64 writes/reads are not atomic.
Extend cfs_b->lock from do_sched_cfs_period_timer() to include the read of
cfs_b->period to solve that issue; unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs() can just
use 1 rather than the exact quota, much like distribute_cfs_runtime()
does.
There is also an unlocked read of cfs_b->runtime_expires, but a race
there would only delay runtime expiry by a tick. Still, the comparison
should just be != anyway, which clarifies even that problem.
Signed-off-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Tested-by: Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru>
[peterz: Fix compile warn]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140519224945.20303.93530.stgit@sword-of-the-dawn.mtv.corp.google.com
Cc: pjt@google.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/fair.c | 40 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index c9617b73bcc0..b71d8c39f1fd 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -3224,10 +3224,12 @@ static void expire_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) * has not truly expired. * * Fortunately we can check determine whether this the case by checking - * whether the global deadline has advanced. + * whether the global deadline has advanced. It is valid to compare + * cfs_b->runtime_expires without any locks since we only care about + * exact equality, so a partial write will still work. */ - if ((s64)(cfs_rq->runtime_expires - cfs_b->runtime_expires) >= 0) { + if (cfs_rq->runtime_expires != cfs_b->runtime_expires) { /* extend local deadline, drift is bounded above by 2 ticks */ cfs_rq->runtime_expires += TICK_NSEC; } else { @@ -3456,21 +3458,21 @@ next: static int do_sched_cfs_period_timer(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b, int overrun) { u64 runtime, runtime_expires; - int idle = 1, throttled; + int throttled; - raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock); /* no need to continue the timer with no bandwidth constraint */ if (cfs_b->quota == RUNTIME_INF) - goto out_unlock; + goto out_deactivate; throttled = !list_empty(&cfs_b->throttled_cfs_rq); - /* idle depends on !throttled (for the case of a large deficit) */ - idle = cfs_b->idle && !throttled; cfs_b->nr_periods += overrun; - /* if we're going inactive then everything else can be deferred */ - if (idle) - goto out_unlock; + /* + * idle depends on !throttled (for the case of a large deficit), and if + * we're going inactive then everything else can be deferred + */ + if (cfs_b->idle && !throttled) + goto out_deactivate; /* * if we have relooped after returning idle once, we need to update our @@ -3484,7 +3486,7 @@ static int do_sched_cfs_period_timer(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b, int overrun) if (!throttled) { /* mark as potentially idle for the upcoming period */ cfs_b->idle = 1; - goto out_unlock; + return 0; } /* account preceding periods in which throttling occurred */ @@ -3524,12 +3526,12 @@ static int do_sched_cfs_period_timer(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b, int overrun) * timer to remain active while there are any throttled entities.) */ cfs_b->idle = 0; -out_unlock: - if (idle) - cfs_b->timer_active = 0; - raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock); - return idle; + return 0; + +out_deactivate: + cfs_b->timer_active = 0; + return 1; } /* a cfs_rq won't donate quota below this amount */ @@ -3706,6 +3708,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart sched_cfs_period_timer(struct hrtimer *timer) int overrun; int idle = 0; + raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock); for (;;) { now = hrtimer_cb_get_time(timer); overrun = hrtimer_forward(timer, now, cfs_b->period); @@ -3715,6 +3718,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart sched_cfs_period_timer(struct hrtimer *timer) idle = do_sched_cfs_period_timer(cfs_b, overrun); } + raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock); return idle ? HRTIMER_NORESTART : HRTIMER_RESTART; } @@ -3774,8 +3778,6 @@ static void __maybe_unused unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs(struct rq *rq) struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq; for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) { - struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = tg_cfs_bandwidth(cfs_rq->tg); - if (!cfs_rq->runtime_enabled) continue; @@ -3783,7 +3785,7 @@ static void __maybe_unused unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs(struct rq *rq) * clock_task is not advancing so we just need to make sure * there's some valid quota amount */ - cfs_rq->runtime_remaining = cfs_b->quota; + cfs_rq->runtime_remaining = 1; if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)) unthrottle_cfs_rq(cfs_rq); } |