diff options
| author | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> | 2017-05-30 22:31:28 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2017-06-01 01:29:47 +0200 |
| commit | f696b8f471ec987e987e38206b8eb23c39ee5a86 (patch) | |
| tree | 9b31d18a68fe91db02039fd999fc1072ab6f76b7 /kernel | |
| parent | bpf: free up BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL | BPF_X opcode (diff) | |
| download | linux-f696b8f471ec987e987e38206b8eb23c39ee5a86.tar.xz linux-f696b8f471ec987e987e38206b8eb23c39ee5a86.zip | |
bpf: split bpf core interpreter
split __bpf_prog_run() interpreter into stack allocation and execution parts.
The code section shrinks which helps interpreter performance in some cases.
text data bss dec hex filename
26350 10328 624 37302 91b6 kernel/bpf/core.o.before
25777 10328 624 36729 8f79 kernel/bpf/core.o.after
Very short programs got slower (due to extra function call):
Before:
test_bpf: #89 ALU64_ADD_K: 1 + 2 = 3 jited:0 7 PASS
test_bpf: #90 ALU64_ADD_K: 3 + 0 = 3 jited:0 8 PASS
test_bpf: #91 ALU64_ADD_K: 1 + 2147483646 = 2147483647 jited:0 7 PASS
test_bpf: #92 ALU64_ADD_K: 4294967294 + 2 = 4294967296 jited:0 11 PASS
test_bpf: #93 ALU64_ADD_K: 2147483646 + -2147483647 = -1 jited:0 7 PASS
After:
test_bpf: #89 ALU64_ADD_K: 1 + 2 = 3 jited:0 11 PASS
test_bpf: #90 ALU64_ADD_K: 3 + 0 = 3 jited:0 11 PASS
test_bpf: #91 ALU64_ADD_K: 1 + 2147483646 = 2147483647 jited:0 11 PASS
test_bpf: #92 ALU64_ADD_K: 4294967294 + 2 = 4294967296 jited:0 14 PASS
test_bpf: #93 ALU64_ADD_K: 2147483646 + -2147483647 = -1 jited:0 10 PASS
Longer programs got faster:
Before:
test_bpf: #266 BPF_MAXINSNS: Ctx heavy transformations jited:0 20286 20513 PASS
test_bpf: #267 BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations jited:0 31853 31768 PASS
test_bpf: #268 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump heavy test jited:0 9815 PASS
test_bpf: #269 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump backwards jited:0 6 PASS
test_bpf: #270 BPF_MAXINSNS: Edge hopping nuthouse jited:0 13959 PASS
test_bpf: #271 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump, gap, jump, ... jited:0 210 PASS
test_bpf: #272 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+get_processor_id jited:0 21724 PASS
test_bpf: #273 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+vlan_push/pop jited:0 19118 PASS
After:
test_bpf: #266 BPF_MAXINSNS: Ctx heavy transformations jited:0 19008 18827 PASS
test_bpf: #267 BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations jited:0 29238 28450 PASS
test_bpf: #268 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump heavy test jited:0 9485 PASS
test_bpf: #269 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump backwards jited:0 12 PASS
test_bpf: #270 BPF_MAXINSNS: Edge hopping nuthouse jited:0 13257 PASS
test_bpf: #271 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump, gap, jump, ... jited:0 213 PASS
test_bpf: #272 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+get_processor_id jited:0 19389 PASS
test_bpf: #273 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+vlan_push/pop jited:0 19583 PASS
For real world production programs the difference is noise.
This patch is first step towards reducing interpreter stack consumption.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/core.c | 21 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index 339289402b96..abd410d394bc 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -763,10 +763,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__bpf_call_base); * * Decode and execute eBPF instructions. */ -static unsigned int __bpf_prog_run(void *ctx, const struct bpf_insn *insn) +static unsigned int ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, + u64 *stack) { - u64 stack[MAX_BPF_STACK / sizeof(u64)]; - u64 regs[MAX_BPF_REG], tmp; + u64 tmp; static const void *jumptable[256] = { [0 ... 255] = &&default_label, /* Now overwrite non-defaults ... */ @@ -874,9 +874,6 @@ static unsigned int __bpf_prog_run(void *ctx, const struct bpf_insn *insn) #define CONT ({ insn++; goto select_insn; }) #define CONT_JMP ({ insn++; goto select_insn; }) - FP = (u64) (unsigned long) &stack[ARRAY_SIZE(stack)]; - ARG1 = (u64) (unsigned long) ctx; - select_insn: goto *jumptable[insn->code]; @@ -1219,7 +1216,17 @@ load_byte: WARN_RATELIMIT(1, "unknown opcode %02x\n", insn->code); return 0; } -STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD(__bpf_prog_run); /* jump table */ +STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD(___bpf_prog_run); /* jump table */ + +static unsigned int __bpf_prog_run(void *ctx, const struct bpf_insn *insn) +{ + u64 stack[MAX_BPF_STACK / sizeof(u64)]; + u64 regs[MAX_BPF_REG]; + + FP = (u64) (unsigned long) &stack[ARRAY_SIZE(stack)]; + ARG1 = (u64) (unsigned long) ctx; + return ___bpf_prog_run(regs, insn, stack); +} bool bpf_prog_array_compatible(struct bpf_array *array, const struct bpf_prog *fp) |