diff options
author | Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> | 2015-07-21 15:40:28 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2015-07-31 10:38:06 +0200 |
commit | db087ef69a2b155ae001665bf0b3806abde7ee34 (patch) | |
tree | 2f9837a9c4323692ca2702e72de7f253331da8d9 /kernel | |
parent | uprobes: Add the "enum rp_check ctx" arg to arch_uretprobe_is_alive() (diff) | |
download | linux-db087ef69a2b155ae001665bf0b3806abde7ee34.tar.xz linux-db087ef69a2b155ae001665bf0b3806abde7ee34.zip |
uprobes/x86: Make arch_uretprobe_is_alive(RP_CHECK_CALL) more clever
The previous change documents that cleanup_return_instances()
can't always detect the dead frames, the stack can grow. But
there is one special case which imho worth fixing:
arch_uretprobe_is_alive() can return true when the stack didn't
actually grow, but the next "call" insn uses the already
invalidated frame.
Test-case:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <setjmp.h>
jmp_buf jmp;
int nr = 1024;
void func_2(void)
{
if (--nr == 0)
return;
longjmp(jmp, 1);
}
void func_1(void)
{
setjmp(jmp);
func_2();
}
int main(void)
{
func_1();
return 0;
}
If you ret-probe func_1() and func_2() prepare_uretprobe() hits
the MAX_URETPROBE_DEPTH limit and "return" from func_2() is not
reported.
When we know that the new call is not chained, we can do the
more strict check. In this case "sp" points to the new ret-addr,
so every frame which uses the same "sp" must be dead. The only
complication is that arch_uretprobe_is_alive() needs to know was
it chained or not, so we add the new RP_CHECK_CHAIN_CALL enum
and change prepare_uretprobe() to pass RP_CHECK_CALL only if
!chained.
Note: arch_uretprobe_is_alive() could also re-read *sp and check
if this word is still trampoline_vaddr. This could obviously
improve the logic, but I would like to avoid another
copy_from_user() especially in the case when we can't avoid the
false "alive == T" positives.
Tested-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Anton Arapov <arapov@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150721134028.GA4786@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/events/uprobes.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c index df5661a44e35..0f370ef57a02 100644 --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c @@ -1511,10 +1511,11 @@ static unsigned long get_trampoline_vaddr(void) return trampoline_vaddr; } -static void cleanup_return_instances(struct uprobe_task *utask, struct pt_regs *regs) +static void cleanup_return_instances(struct uprobe_task *utask, bool chained, + struct pt_regs *regs) { struct return_instance *ri = utask->return_instances; - enum rp_check ctx = RP_CHECK_CALL; + enum rp_check ctx = chained ? RP_CHECK_CHAIN_CALL : RP_CHECK_CALL; while (ri && !arch_uretprobe_is_alive(ri, ctx, regs)) { ri = free_ret_instance(ri); @@ -1528,7 +1529,7 @@ static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs) struct return_instance *ri; struct uprobe_task *utask; unsigned long orig_ret_vaddr, trampoline_vaddr; - bool chained = false; + bool chained; if (!get_xol_area()) return; @@ -1554,14 +1555,15 @@ static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs) goto fail; /* drop the entries invalidated by longjmp() */ - cleanup_return_instances(utask, regs); + chained = (orig_ret_vaddr == trampoline_vaddr); + cleanup_return_instances(utask, chained, regs); /* * We don't want to keep trampoline address in stack, rather keep the * original return address of first caller thru all the consequent * instances. This also makes breakpoint unwrapping easier. */ - if (orig_ret_vaddr == trampoline_vaddr) { + if (chained) { if (!utask->return_instances) { /* * This situation is not possible. Likely we have an @@ -1570,8 +1572,6 @@ static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs) uprobe_warn(current, "handle tail call"); goto fail; } - - chained = true; orig_ret_vaddr = utask->return_instances->orig_ret_vaddr; } |