summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>2018-11-22 06:39:52 +0100
committerDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>2018-11-22 10:35:13 +0100
commit8d75839b843ae0ef8d9db97ed05b493e687e6b75 (patch)
treea105ed36362e91dede6e6d145e215c9fb9ea4007 /kernel
parentMerge branch 'bpf-libbpf-mapinmap' (diff)
downloadlinux-8d75839b843ae0ef8d9db97ed05b493e687e6b75.tar.xz
linux-8d75839b843ae0ef8d9db97ed05b493e687e6b75.zip
bpf, lpm: make longest_prefix_match() faster
At LPC 2018 in Vancouver, Vlad Dumitrescu mentioned that longest_prefix_match() has a high cost [1]. One reason for that cost is a loop handling one byte at a time. We can handle more bytes at a time, if enough attention is paid to endianness. I was able to remove ~55 % of longest_prefix_match() cpu costs. [1] https://linuxplumbersconf.org/event/2/contributions/88/attachments/76/87/lpc-bpf-2018-shaping.pdf Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Vlad Dumitrescu <vladum@google.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c59
1 files changed, 49 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
index 9058317ba9de..bfd4882e1106 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
@@ -168,20 +168,59 @@ static size_t longest_prefix_match(const struct lpm_trie *trie,
const struct lpm_trie_node *node,
const struct bpf_lpm_trie_key *key)
{
- size_t prefixlen = 0;
- size_t i;
+ u32 limit = min(node->prefixlen, key->prefixlen);
+ u32 prefixlen = 0, i = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < trie->data_size; i++) {
- size_t b;
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct lpm_trie_node, data) % sizeof(u32));
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct bpf_lpm_trie_key, data) % sizeof(u32));
- b = 8 - fls(node->data[i] ^ key->data[i]);
- prefixlen += b;
+#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && defined(CONFIG_64BIT)
- if (prefixlen >= node->prefixlen || prefixlen >= key->prefixlen)
- return min(node->prefixlen, key->prefixlen);
+ /* data_size >= 16 has very small probability.
+ * We do not use a loop for optimal code generation.
+ */
+ if (trie->data_size >= 8) {
+ u64 diff = be64_to_cpu(*(__be64 *)node->data ^
+ *(__be64 *)key->data);
+
+ prefixlen = 64 - fls64(diff);
+ if (prefixlen >= limit)
+ return limit;
+ if (diff)
+ return prefixlen;
+ i = 8;
+ }
+#endif
+
+ while (trie->data_size >= i + 4) {
+ u32 diff = be32_to_cpu(*(__be32 *)&node->data[i] ^
+ *(__be32 *)&key->data[i]);
+
+ prefixlen += 32 - fls(diff);
+ if (prefixlen >= limit)
+ return limit;
+ if (diff)
+ return prefixlen;
+ i += 4;
+ }
- if (b < 8)
- break;
+ if (trie->data_size >= i + 2) {
+ u16 diff = be16_to_cpu(*(__be16 *)&node->data[i] ^
+ *(__be16 *)&key->data[i]);
+
+ prefixlen += 16 - fls(diff);
+ if (prefixlen >= limit)
+ return limit;
+ if (diff)
+ return prefixlen;
+ i += 2;
+ }
+
+ if (trie->data_size >= i + 1) {
+ prefixlen += 8 - fls(node->data[i] ^ key->data[i]);
+
+ if (prefixlen >= limit)
+ return limit;
}
return prefixlen;