diff options
author | Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> | 2024-08-12 23:48:47 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2024-08-13 03:09:48 +0200 |
commit | bed2eb964c70b780fb55925892a74f26cb590b25 (patch) | |
tree | 6b3b06cd087a165a9985ba6a859f43b7684291f7 /kernel | |
parent | bpf: Fix updating attached freplace prog in prog_array map (diff) | |
download | linux-bed2eb964c70b780fb55925892a74f26cb590b25.tar.xz linux-bed2eb964c70b780fb55925892a74f26cb590b25.zip |
bpf: Fix a kernel verifier crash in stacksafe()
Daniel Hodges reported a kernel verifier crash when playing with sched-ext.
Further investigation shows that the crash is due to invalid memory access
in stacksafe(). More specifically, it is the following code:
if (exact != NOT_EXACT &&
old->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] !=
cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE])
return false;
The 'i' iterates old->allocated_stack.
If cur->allocated_stack < old->allocated_stack the out-of-bound
access will happen.
To fix the issue add 'i >= cur->allocated_stack' check such that if
the condition is true, stacksafe() should fail. Otherwise,
cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] memory access is legal.
Fixes: 2793a8b015f7 ("bpf: exact states comparison for iterator convergence checks")
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Daniel Hodges <hodgesd@meta.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240812214847.213612-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 5 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 4cb5441ad75f..d8520095ca03 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -16884,8 +16884,9 @@ static bool stacksafe(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_func_state *old, spi = i / BPF_REG_SIZE; if (exact != NOT_EXACT && - old->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] != - cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE]) + (i >= cur->allocated_stack || + old->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] != + cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE])) return false; if (!(old->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.live & REG_LIVE_READ) |