summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>2024-08-12 23:48:47 +0200
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2024-08-13 03:09:48 +0200
commitbed2eb964c70b780fb55925892a74f26cb590b25 (patch)
tree6b3b06cd087a165a9985ba6a859f43b7684291f7 /kernel
parentbpf: Fix updating attached freplace prog in prog_array map (diff)
downloadlinux-bed2eb964c70b780fb55925892a74f26cb590b25.tar.xz
linux-bed2eb964c70b780fb55925892a74f26cb590b25.zip
bpf: Fix a kernel verifier crash in stacksafe()
Daniel Hodges reported a kernel verifier crash when playing with sched-ext. Further investigation shows that the crash is due to invalid memory access in stacksafe(). More specifically, it is the following code: if (exact != NOT_EXACT && old->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] != cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE]) return false; The 'i' iterates old->allocated_stack. If cur->allocated_stack < old->allocated_stack the out-of-bound access will happen. To fix the issue add 'i >= cur->allocated_stack' check such that if the condition is true, stacksafe() should fail. Otherwise, cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] memory access is legal. Fixes: 2793a8b015f7 ("bpf: exact states comparison for iterator convergence checks") Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Reported-by: Daniel Hodges <hodgesd@meta.com> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240812214847.213612-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/verifier.c5
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 4cb5441ad75f..d8520095ca03 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -16884,8 +16884,9 @@ static bool stacksafe(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_func_state *old,
spi = i / BPF_REG_SIZE;
if (exact != NOT_EXACT &&
- old->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] !=
- cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE])
+ (i >= cur->allocated_stack ||
+ old->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] !=
+ cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE]))
return false;
if (!(old->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.live & REG_LIVE_READ)