diff options
| author | Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> | 2019-05-24 21:42:22 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2019-05-24 23:17:18 +0200 |
| commit | 51816e9e113934281b44f1a352852ef7631e75ea (patch) | |
| tree | 2f2d6cc2f33a22e3a0603d844396bf3f5d5b6592 /lib/lzo | |
| parent | Merge tag 'arm64-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm6... (diff) | |
| download | linux-51816e9e113934281b44f1a352852ef7631e75ea.tar.xz linux-51816e9e113934281b44f1a352852ef7631e75ea.zip | |
locking/lock_events: Use this_cpu_add() when necessary
The kernel test robot has reported that the use of __this_cpu_add()
causes bug messages like:
BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: ...
Given the imprecise nature of the count and the possibility of resetting
the count and doing the measurement again, this is not really a big
problem to use the unprotected __this_cpu_*() functions.
To make the preemption checking code happy, the this_cpu_*() functions
will be used if CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT is defined.
The imprecise nature of the locking counts are also documented with
the suggestion that we should run the measurement a few times with the
counts reset in between to get a better picture of what is going on
under the hood.
Fixes: a8654596f0371 ("locking/rwsem: Enable lock event counting")
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/lzo')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions