diff options
| author | Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> | 2023-12-15 16:13:27 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> | 2023-12-18 21:39:05 +0100 |
| commit | 342fb9789267ee3908959bfa136b82e88e2ce918 (patch) | |
| tree | 59a160cedeaca5496cfbcff06cadf1d34841ab75 /lib | |
| parent | kunit: Add example for using test->priv (diff) | |
| download | linux-342fb9789267ee3908959bfa136b82e88e2ce918.tar.xz linux-342fb9789267ee3908959bfa136b82e88e2ce918.zip | |
kunit: Reset test->priv after each param iteration
If we run parameterized test that uses test->priv to prepare some
custom data, then value of test->priv will leak to the next param
iteration and may be unexpected. This could be easily seen if
we promote example_priv_test to parameterized test as then only
first test iteration will be successful:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run \
--kunitconfig ./lib/kunit/.kunitconfig *.example_priv*
[ ] Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
[ ] ============================================================
[ ] =================== example (1 subtest) ====================
[ ] ==================== example_priv_test ====================
[ ] [PASSED] example value 3
[ ] # example_priv_test: initializing
[ ] # example_priv_test: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c:230
[ ] Expected test->priv == ((void *)0), but
[ ] test->priv == 0000000060dfe290
[ ] ((void *)0) == 0000000000000000
[ ] # example_priv_test: cleaning up
[ ] [FAILED] example value 2
[ ] # example_priv_test: initializing
[ ] # example_priv_test: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c:230
[ ] Expected test->priv == ((void *)0), but
[ ] test->priv == 0000000060dfe290
[ ] ((void *)0) == 0000000000000000
[ ] # example_priv_test: cleaning up
[ ] [FAILED] example value 1
[ ] # example_priv_test: initializing
[ ] # example_priv_test: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c:230
[ ] Expected test->priv == ((void *)0), but
[ ] test->priv == 0000000060dfe290
[ ] ((void *)0) == 0000000000000000
[ ] # example_priv_test: cleaning up
[ ] [FAILED] example value 0
[ ] # example_priv_test: initializing
[ ] # example_priv_test: cleaning up
[ ] # example_priv_test: pass:1 fail:3 skip:0 total:4
[ ] ================ [FAILED] example_priv_test ================
[ ] # example: initializing suite
[ ] # module: kunit_example_test
[ ] # example: exiting suite
[ ] # Totals: pass:1 fail:3 skip:0 total:4
[ ] ===================== [FAILED] example =====================
Fix that by resetting test->priv after each param iteration, in
similar way what we did for the test->status.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/kunit/test.c | 1 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index 14a77b2d702a..3a3d4ebb35db 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -664,6 +664,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) test.param_index++; test.status = KUNIT_SUCCESS; test.status_comment[0] = '\0'; + test.priv = NULL; } } |