diff options
author | Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> | 2024-04-15 19:18:53 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2024-04-26 05:56:09 +0200 |
commit | de60fd8ddeda2b41fbe11df11733838c5f684616 (patch) | |
tree | b9cbb38efa1f619688a6daf3d6403074b941c7fa /mm/filemap.c | |
parent | mm: convert folio_estimated_sharers() to folio_likely_mapped_shared() (diff) | |
download | linux-de60fd8ddeda2b41fbe11df11733838c5f684616.tar.xz linux-de60fd8ddeda2b41fbe11df11733838c5f684616.zip |
mm/filemap: return early if failed to allocate memory for split
Patch series "mm/filemap: optimize folio adding and splitting", v4.
Currently, at least 3 tree walks are needed for filemap folio adding if
the folio is previously evicted. One for getting the order of current
slot, one for ranged conflict check, and one for another order retrieving.
If a split is needed, more walks are needed.
This series is trying to merge these walks, and speed up
filemap_add_folio, I see a 7.5% - 12.5% performance gain for fio stress
test.
So instead of doing multiple tree walks, do one optimism range check with
lock hold, and exit if raced with another insertion. If a shadow exists,
check it with a new xas_get_order helper before releasing the lock to
avoid redundant tree walks for getting its order.
Drop the lock and do the allocation only if a split is needed.
In the best case, it only need to walk the tree once. If it needs to
alloc and split, 3 walks are issued (One for first ranged conflict check
and order retrieving, one for the second check after allocation, one for
the insert after split).
Testing with 4K pages, in an 8G cgroup, with 16G brd as block device:
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
fio -name=cached --numjobs=16 --filename=/mnt/test.img \
--buffered=1 --ioengine=mmap --rw=randread --time_based \
--ramp_time=30s --runtime=5m --group_reporting
Before:
bw ( MiB/s): min= 1027, max= 3520, per=100.00%, avg=2445.02, stdev=18.90, samples=8691
iops : min=263001, max=901288, avg=625924.36, stdev=4837.28, samples=8691
After (+7.3%):
bw ( MiB/s): min= 493, max= 3947, per=100.00%, avg=2625.56, stdev=25.74, samples=8651
iops : min=126454, max=1010681, avg=672142.61, stdev=6590.48, samples=8651
Test result with THP (do a THP randread then switch to 4K page in hope it
issues a lot of splitting):
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
fio -name=cached --numjobs=16 --filename=/mnt/test.img \
--buffered=1 --ioengine=mmap -thp=1 --readonly \
--rw=randread --time_based --ramp_time=30s --runtime=10m \
--group_reporting
fio -name=cached --numjobs=16 --filename=/mnt/test.img \
--buffered=1 --ioengine=mmap \
--rw=randread --time_based --runtime=5s --group_reporting
Before:
bw ( KiB/s): min= 4141, max=14202, per=100.00%, avg=7935.51, stdev=96.85, samples=18976
iops : min= 1029, max= 3548, avg=1979.52, stdev=24.23, samples=18976ยท
READ: bw=4545B/s (4545B/s), 4545B/s-4545B/s (4545B/s-4545B/s), io=64.0KiB (65.5kB), run=14419-14419msec
After (+10.4%):
bw ( KiB/s): min= 4611, max=15370, per=100.00%, avg=8928.74, stdev=105.17, samples=19146
iops : min= 1151, max= 3842, avg=2231.27, stdev=26.29, samples=19146
READ: bw=4635B/s (4635B/s), 4635B/s-4635B/s (4635B/s-4635B/s), io=64.0KiB (65.5kB), run=14137-14137msec
The performance is better for both 4K (+7.5%) and THP (+12.5%) cached read.
This patch (of 4):
xas_split_alloc could fail with NOMEM, and in such case, it should abort
early instead of keep going and fail the xas_split below.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240416071722.45997-1-ryncsn@gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240415171857.19244-1-ryncsn@gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240415171857.19244-2-ryncsn@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Acked-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/filemap.c | 5 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c index 480ae6589803..12089c24abfb 100644 --- a/mm/filemap.c +++ b/mm/filemap.c @@ -880,9 +880,12 @@ noinline int __filemap_add_folio(struct address_space *mapping, unsigned int order = xa_get_order(xas.xa, xas.xa_index); void *entry, *old = NULL; - if (order > folio_order(folio)) + if (order > folio_order(folio)) { xas_split_alloc(&xas, xa_load(xas.xa, xas.xa_index), order, gfp); + if (xas_error(&xas)) + goto error; + } xas_lock_irq(&xas); xas_for_each_conflict(&xas, entry) { old = entry; |