diff options
author | David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> | 2022-10-21 12:11:37 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2022-12-12 03:12:08 +0100 |
commit | 6cce3314b928b2db7d5f48171e18314226551c3f (patch) | |
tree | f1bec766a9b742321f4dcba2ca0c96c1088786f7 /mm/ksm.c | |
parent | mm: remove VM_FAULT_WRITE (diff) | |
download | linux-6cce3314b928b2db7d5f48171e18314226551c3f.tar.xz linux-6cce3314b928b2db7d5f48171e18314226551c3f.zip |
mm/ksm: fix KSM COW breaking with userfaultfd-wp via FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE
Let's stop breaking COW via a fake write fault and let's use
FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE instead. This avoids any wrong side effects of the
fake write fault, such as mapping the PTE writable and marking the pte
dirty/softdirty.
Consequently, we will no longer trigger a fake write fault and break COW
without any such side-effects.
Also, this fixes KSM interaction with userfaultfd-wp: when we have a KSM
page that's write-protected by userfaultfd, break_ksm()->handle_mm_fault()
will fail with VM_FAULT_SIGBUS and will simply return in break_ksm() with
0 instead of actually breaking COW.
For now, the KSM unmerge tests can trigger that:
$ sudo ./ksm_functional_tests
TAP version 13
1..3
# [RUN] test_unmerge
ok 1 Pages were unmerged
# [RUN] test_unmerge_discarded
ok 2 Pages were unmerged
# [RUN] test_unmerge_uffd_wp
not ok 3 Pages were unmerged
Bail out! 1 out of 3 tests failed
# Planned tests != run tests (2 != 3)
# Totals: pass:2 fail:1 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
The warning in dmesg also indicates this wrong handling:
[ 230.096368] FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY missing 881
[ 230.100822] CPU: 1 PID: 1643 Comm: ksm-uffd-wp [...]
[ 230.110124] Hardware name: [...]
[ 230.117775] Call Trace:
[ 230.120227] <TASK>
[ 230.122334] dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x5c
[ 230.126010] handle_userfault.cold+0x14/0x19
[ 230.130281] ? tlb_finish_mmu+0x65/0x170
[ 230.134207] ? uffd_wp_range+0x65/0xa0
[ 230.137959] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x15/0x30
[ 230.141972] ? do_wp_page+0x50/0x590
[ 230.145551] __handle_mm_fault+0x9f5/0xf50
[ 230.149652] ? mmput+0x1f/0x40
[ 230.152712] handle_mm_fault+0xb9/0x2a0
[ 230.156550] break_ksm+0x141/0x180
[ 230.159964] unmerge_ksm_pages+0x60/0x90
[ 230.163890] ksm_madvise+0x3c/0xb0
[ 230.167295] do_madvise.part.0+0x10c/0xeb0
[ 230.171396] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80
[ 230.175157] __x64_sys_madvise+0x5a/0x70
[ 230.179082] do_syscall_64+0x58/0x80
[ 230.182661] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80
[ 230.186413] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
This is primarily a fix for KSM+userfaultfd-wp, however, the fake write
fault was always questionable. As this fix is not easy to backport and
it's not very critical, let's not cc stable.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221021101141.84170-6-david@redhat.com
Fixes: 529b930b87d9 ("userfaultfd: wp: hook userfault handler to write protection fault")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/ksm.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/ksm.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 7 deletions
@@ -420,17 +420,15 @@ static inline bool ksm_test_exit(struct mm_struct *mm) } /* - * We use break_ksm to break COW on a ksm page: it's a stripped down + * We use break_ksm to break COW on a ksm page by triggering unsharing, + * such that the ksm page will get replaced by an exclusive anonymous page. * - * if (get_user_pages(addr, 1, FOLL_WRITE, &page, NULL) == 1) - * put_page(page); - * - * but taking great care only to touch a ksm page, in a VM_MERGEABLE vma, + * We take great care only to touch a ksm page, in a VM_MERGEABLE vma, * in case the application has unmapped and remapped mm,addr meanwhile. * Could a ksm page appear anywhere else? Actually yes, in a VM_PFNMAP * mmap of /dev/mem, where we would not want to touch it. * - * FAULT_FLAG/FOLL_REMOTE are because we do this outside the context + * FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE/FOLL_REMOTE are because we do this outside the context * of the process that owns 'vma'. We also do not want to enforce * protection keys here anyway. */ @@ -454,7 +452,7 @@ static int break_ksm(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr) if (!ksm_page) return 0; ret = handle_mm_fault(vma, addr, - FAULT_FLAG_WRITE | FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE, + FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE | FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE, NULL); } while (!(ret & (VM_FAULT_SIGBUS | VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV | VM_FAULT_OOM))); /* |