diff options
author | Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> | 2023-04-06 09:25:29 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2023-04-19 01:29:42 +0200 |
commit | 59f876fb9d68a4d8c20305d7a7a0daf4ee9478a8 (patch) | |
tree | 4b4d6b6bfd75ea2623b77598ca8fa445a027b526 /mm/memblock.c | |
parent | sync mm-stable with mm-hotfixes-stable to pick up depended-upon upstream changes (diff) | |
download | linux-59f876fb9d68a4d8c20305d7a7a0daf4ee9478a8.tar.xz linux-59f876fb9d68a4d8c20305d7a7a0daf4ee9478a8.zip |
mm: avoid passing 0 to __ffs()
23baf831a32c ("mm, treewide: redefine MAX_ORDER sanely") results in
various boot failures (hang) on arm targets Debug messages reveal the
reason.
########### MAX_ORDER=10 start=0 __ffs(start)=-1 min()=10 min_t=-1
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
If start==0, __ffs(start) returns 0xfffffff or (as int) -1, which min_t()
interprets as such, while min() apparently uses the returned unsigned long
value. Obviously a negative order isn't received well by the rest of the
code.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix comment, per Mike]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/ZDBa7HWZK69dKKzH@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230406072529.vupqyrzqnhyozeyh@box.shutemov.name
Fixes: 23baf831a32c ("mm, treewide: redefine MAX_ORDER sanely")
Signed-off-by: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/9460377a-38aa-4f39-ad57-fb73725f92db@roeck-us.net
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/memblock.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/memblock.c | 11 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c index 7911224b1ed3..3feafea06ab2 100644 --- a/mm/memblock.c +++ b/mm/memblock.c @@ -2043,7 +2043,16 @@ static void __init __free_pages_memory(unsigned long start, unsigned long end) int order; while (start < end) { - order = min_t(int, MAX_ORDER, __ffs(start)); + /* + * Free the pages in the largest chunks alignment allows. + * + * __ffs() behaviour is undefined for 0. start == 0 is + * MAX_ORDER-aligned, set order to MAX_ORDER for the case. + */ + if (start) + order = min_t(int, MAX_ORDER, __ffs(start)); + else + order = MAX_ORDER; while (start + (1UL << order) > end) order--; |