diff options
| author | Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> | 2017-05-03 23:56:19 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2017-05-04 00:52:12 +0200 |
| commit | 8bcb74de764aaa261d6af3ce5ac723e435f00ff4 (patch) | |
| tree | 614316758c5c70378ce2fcf40d3c40b2c5d871a9 /mm/memory-failure.c | |
| parent | mm/swapfile.c: fix swap space leak in error path of swap_free_entries() (diff) | |
| download | linux-8bcb74de764aaa261d6af3ce5ac723e435f00ff4.tar.xz linux-8bcb74de764aaa261d6af3ce5ac723e435f00ff4.zip | |
mm: hwpoison: call shake_page() unconditionally
shake_page() is called before going into core error handling code in
order to ensure that the error page is flushed from lru_cache lists
where pages stay during transferring among LRU lists.
But currently it's not fully functional because when the page is linked
to lru_cache by calling activate_page(), its PageLRU flag is set and
shake_page() is skipped. The result is to fail error handling with
"still referenced by 1 users" message.
When the page is linked to lru_cache by isolate_lru_page(), its PageLRU
is clear, so that's fine.
This patch makes shake_page() unconditionally called to avoild the
failure.
Fixes: 23a003bfd23ea9ea0b7756b920e51f64b284b468 ("mm/madvise: pass return code of memory_failure() to userspace")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170417055948.GM31394@yexl-desktop
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1493197841-23986-2-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Cc: Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/memory-failure.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/memory-failure.c | 27 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c index 92865bb1816d..9d87fcab96c9 100644 --- a/mm/memory-failure.c +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c @@ -220,6 +220,9 @@ static int kill_proc(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long addr, int trapno, */ void shake_page(struct page *p, int access) { + if (PageHuge(p)) + return; + if (!PageSlab(p)) { lru_add_drain_all(); if (PageLRU(p)) @@ -1137,22 +1140,14 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int trapno, int flags) * The check (unnecessarily) ignores LRU pages being isolated and * walked by the page reclaim code, however that's not a big loss. */ - if (!PageHuge(p)) { - if (!PageLRU(p)) - shake_page(p, 0); - if (!PageLRU(p)) { - /* - * shake_page could have turned it free. - */ - if (is_free_buddy_page(p)) { - if (flags & MF_COUNT_INCREASED) - action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_BUDDY, MF_DELAYED); - else - action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_BUDDY_2ND, - MF_DELAYED); - return 0; - } - } + shake_page(p, 0); + /* shake_page could have turned it free. */ + if (!PageLRU(p) && is_free_buddy_page(p)) { + if (flags & MF_COUNT_INCREASED) + action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_BUDDY, MF_DELAYED); + else + action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_BUDDY_2ND, MF_DELAYED); + return 0; } lock_page(hpage); |