summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm/memory_hotplug.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorCharan Teja Reddy <charante@codeaurora.org>2020-08-07 08:25:24 +0200
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2020-08-07 20:33:28 +0200
commitf80b08fc44536a311a9f3182e50f318b79076425 (patch)
tree44614f65639dfe0716b4f66ced3c60339c6f89da /mm/memory_hotplug.c
parentpage_alloc: consider highatomic reserve in watermark fast (diff)
downloadlinux-f80b08fc44536a311a9f3182e50f318b79076425.tar.xz
linux-f80b08fc44536a311a9f3182e50f318b79076425.zip
mm, page_alloc: skip ->waternark_boost for atomic order-0 allocations
When boosting is enabled, it is observed that rate of atomic order-0 allocation failures are high due to the fact that free levels in the system are checked with ->watermark_boost offset. This is not a problem for sleepable allocations but for atomic allocations which looks like regression. This problem is seen frequently on system setup of Android kernel running on Snapdragon hardware with 4GB RAM size. When no extfrag event occurred in the system, ->watermark_boost factor is zero, thus the watermark configurations in the system are: _watermark = ( [WMARK_MIN] = 1272, --> ~5MB [WMARK_LOW] = 9067, --> ~36MB [WMARK_HIGH] = 9385), --> ~38MB watermark_boost = 0 After launching some memory hungry applications in Android which can cause extfrag events in the system to an extent that ->watermark_boost can be set to max i.e. default boost factor makes it to 150% of high watermark. _watermark = ( [WMARK_MIN] = 1272, --> ~5MB [WMARK_LOW] = 9067, --> ~36MB [WMARK_HIGH] = 9385), --> ~38MB watermark_boost = 14077, -->~57MB With default system configuration, for an atomic order-0 allocation to succeed, having free memory of ~2MB will suffice. But boosting makes the min_wmark to ~61MB thus for an atomic order-0 allocation to be successful system should have minimum of ~23MB of free memory(from calculations of zone_watermark_ok(), min = 3/4(min/2)). But failures are observed despite system is having ~20MB of free memory. In the testing, this is reproducible as early as first 300secs since boot and with furtherlowram configurations(<2GB) it is observed as early as first 150secs since boot. These failures can be avoided by excluding the ->watermark_boost in watermark caluculations for atomic order-0 allocations. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix comment grammar, reflow comment] [charante@codeaurora.org: fix suggested by Mel Gorman] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/31556793-57b1-1c21-1a9d-22674d9bd938@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Charan Teja Reddy <charante@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1589882284-21010-1-git-send-email-charante@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/memory_hotplug.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions