diff options
author | Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> | 2017-07-11 00:49:54 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2017-07-11 01:32:33 +0200 |
commit | 32e4e6d5cbb0c0e427391635991fe65e17797af8 (patch) | |
tree | 99fd2fe16b0823ff35bf616f1f3dad661e21cec9 /mm/mmap.c | |
parent | mm/mmap.c: do not blow on PROT_NONE MAP_FIXED holes in the stack (diff) | |
download | linux-32e4e6d5cbb0c0e427391635991fe65e17797af8.tar.xz linux-32e4e6d5cbb0c0e427391635991fe65e17797af8.zip |
mm/mmap.c: expand_downwards: don't require the gap if !vm_prev
expand_stack(vma) fails if address < stack_guard_gap even if there is no
vma->vm_prev. I don't think this makes sense, and we didn't do this
before the recent commit 1be7107fbe18 ("mm: larger stack guard gap,
between vmas").
We do not need a gap in this case, any address is fine as long as
security_mmap_addr() doesn't object.
This also simplifies the code, we know that address >= prev->vm_end and
thus underflow is not possible.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170628175258.GA24881@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/mmap.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/mmap.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c index d1902872414f..49c56b811b03 100644 --- a/mm/mmap.c +++ b/mm/mmap.c @@ -2316,7 +2316,6 @@ int expand_downwards(struct vm_area_struct *vma, { struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm; struct vm_area_struct *prev; - unsigned long gap_addr; int error; address &= PAGE_MASK; @@ -2325,15 +2324,12 @@ int expand_downwards(struct vm_area_struct *vma, return error; /* Enforce stack_guard_gap */ - gap_addr = address - stack_guard_gap; - if (gap_addr > address) - return -ENOMEM; prev = vma->vm_prev; - if (prev && prev->vm_end > gap_addr && + /* Check that both stack segments have the same anon_vma? */ + if (prev && !(prev->vm_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN) && (prev->vm_flags & (VM_WRITE|VM_READ|VM_EXEC))) { - if (!(prev->vm_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN)) + if (address - prev->vm_end < stack_guard_gap) return -ENOMEM; - /* Check that both stack segments have the same anon_vma? */ } /* We must make sure the anon_vma is allocated. */ |