diff options
author | Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | 2017-02-24 23:59:13 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2017-02-25 02:46:56 +0100 |
commit | cee216a696b2004017a5ecb583366093d90b1568 (patch) | |
tree | 4270e8e8e17a7450395e374b3a10391818d08d45 /mm/mprotect.c | |
parent | mm/shmem.c: fix unlikely() test of info->seals to test only for WRITE and GROW (diff) | |
download | linux-cee216a696b2004017a5ecb583366093d90b1568.tar.xz linux-cee216a696b2004017a5ecb583366093d90b1568.zip |
mm/autonuma: don't use set_pte_at when updating protnone ptes
Architectures like ppc64, use privilege access bit to mark pte non
accessible. This implies that kernel can do a copy_to_user to an
address marked for numa fault. This also implies that there can be a
parallel hardware update for the pte. set_pte_at cannot be used in such
scenarios. Hence switch the pte update to use ptep_get_and_clear and
set_pte_at combination.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unwanted ppc change, per Aneesh]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1486400776-28114-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/mprotect.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions