diff options
author | Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> | 2024-04-25 15:17:22 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2024-05-06 02:53:52 +0200 |
commit | fabd2e42bc71d78d1e9dcd5af453d1ab86cc2a7e (patch) | |
tree | e9cf319b5830b37bd3bc9b11f584cc0e1c0b93ab /mm/page-writeback.c | |
parent | mm: enable __wb_calc_thresh to calculate dirty background threshold (diff) | |
download | linux-fabd2e42bc71d78d1e9dcd5af453d1ab86cc2a7e.tar.xz linux-fabd2e42bc71d78d1e9dcd5af453d1ab86cc2a7e.zip |
mm: correct calculation of wb's bg_thresh in cgroup domain
wb_calc_thresh() is calculating wb's share of bg_thresh in the global
domain. However in case of cgroup writeback this is not the right
thing to do. Consider the following domain hierarchy:
global domain (> 20G)
/ \
cgroup1 (10G) cgroup2 (10G)
| |
bdi wb1 wb2
and assume wb1 and wb2 have the same bandwidth and the background
threshold is set at 10%. The bg_thresh of cgroup1 and cgroup2 is going
to be 1G. Now because wb_calc_thresh(mdtc->wb, mdtc->bg_thresh)
calculates per-wb threshold in the global domain as (wb bandwidth) /
(domain bandwidth) it returns bg_thresh for wb1 as 0.5G although it has
nobody to compete against in cgroup1.
Fix the problem by calculating wb's share of bg_thresh in the cgroup
domain.
Test as following:
/* make it easier to observe the issue */
echo 300000 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_expire_centisecs
echo 100 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_writeback_centisecs
/* run fio in wb1 */
cd /sys/fs/cgroup
echo "+memory +io" > cgroup.subtree_control
mkdir group1
cd group1
echo 10G > memory.high
echo 10G > memory.max
echo $$ > cgroup.procs
mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/vdb
mount /dev/vdb /bdi1/
fio -name test -filename=/bdi1/file -size=600M -ioengine=libaio -bs=4K \
-iodepth=1 -rw=write -direct=0 --time_based -runtime=600 -invalidate=0
/* run fio in wb2 with a new shell */
cd /sys/fs/cgroup
mkdir group2
cd group2
echo 10G > memory.high
echo 10G > memory.max
echo $$ > cgroup.procs
mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/vdc
mount /dev/vdc /bdi2/
fio -name test -filename=/bdi2/file -size=600M -ioengine=libaio -bs=4K \
-iodepth=1 -rw=write -direct=0 --time_based -runtime=600 -invalidate=0
Before fix, the wrttien pages of wb1 and wb2 reported from
toos/writeback/wb_monitor.py keep growing. After fix, rare written pages
are accumulated.
There is no obvious change in fio result.
[jack@suse.cz: changelog rewording]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240425131724.36778-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Fixes: 74d369443325 ("writeback: Fix performance regression in wb_over_bg_thresh()")
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Howard Cochran <hcochran@kernelspring.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/page-writeback.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/page-writeback.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c index 2a3b68aae336..14893b20d38c 100644 --- a/mm/page-writeback.c +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c @@ -2137,7 +2137,7 @@ bool wb_over_bg_thresh(struct bdi_writeback *wb) if (mdtc->dirty > mdtc->bg_thresh) return true; - thresh = wb_calc_thresh(mdtc->wb, mdtc->bg_thresh); + thresh = __wb_calc_thresh(mdtc, mdtc->bg_thresh); if (thresh < 2 * wb_stat_error()) reclaimable = wb_stat_sum(wb, WB_RECLAIMABLE); else |