mm/writeback: Add folio_mark_dirty()

Reimplement set_page_dirty() as a wrapper around folio_mark_dirty().
There is no change to filesystems as they were already being called
with the compound_head of the page being marked dirty.  We avoid
several calls to compound_head(), both statically (through
using folio_test_dirty() instead of PageDirty() and dynamically by
calling folio_mapping() instead of page_mapping().

Also return bool instead of int to show the range of values actually
returned, and add kernel-doc.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

1 files changed, 19 insertions, 16 deletions

diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index 82938b037103..c79801656f5b 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -2581,18 +2581,21 @@ int redirty_page_for_writepage(struct writeback_control *wbc, struct page *page)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(redirty_page_for_writepage);
 
-/*
- * Dirty a page.
+/**
+ * folio_mark_dirty - Mark a folio as being modified.
+ * @folio: The folio.
+ *
+ * For folios with a mapping this should be done under the page lock
+ * for the benefit of asynchronous memory errors who prefer a consistent
+ * dirty state. This rule can be broken in some special cases,
+ * but should be better not to.
  *
- * For pages with a mapping this should be done under the page lock for the
- * benefit of asynchronous memory errors who prefer a consistent dirty state.
- * This rule can be broken in some special cases, but should be better not to.
+ * Return: True if the folio was newly dirtied, false if it was already dirty.
  */
-int set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
+bool folio_mark_dirty(struct folio *folio)
 {
-	struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
+	struct address_space *mapping = folio_mapping(folio);
 
-	page = compound_head(page);
 	if (likely(mapping)) {
 		/*
 		 * readahead/lru_deactivate_page could remain
@@ -2604,17 +2607,17 @@ int set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
 		 * it will confuse readahead and make it restart the size rampup
 		 * process. But it's a trivial problem.
 		 */
-		if (PageReclaim(page))
-			ClearPageReclaim(page);
-		return mapping->a_ops->set_page_dirty(page);
+		if (folio_test_reclaim(folio))
+			folio_clear_reclaim(folio);
+		return mapping->a_ops->set_page_dirty(&folio->page);
 	}
-	if (!PageDirty(page)) {
-		if (!TestSetPageDirty(page))
-			return 1;
+	if (!folio_test_dirty(folio)) {
+		if (!folio_test_set_dirty(folio))
+			return true;
 	}
-	return 0;
+	return false;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_page_dirty);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(folio_mark_dirty);
 
 /*
  * set_page_dirty() is racy if the caller has no reference against