summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm/slub.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>2009-06-22 17:54:27 +0200
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2009-06-22 20:29:00 +0200
commitdfa7c4d869b7d3d37b70f1de856f2901b6ebfcf0 (patch)
tree25726788fc2476e25dafff3ce163084531f7ddfd /mm/slub.c
parentparport_pc: after superio probing restore original register values (diff)
downloadlinux-dfa7c4d869b7d3d37b70f1de856f2901b6ebfcf0.tar.xz
linux-dfa7c4d869b7d3d37b70f1de856f2901b6ebfcf0.zip
parport_pc: set properly the dma_mask for parport_pc device
parport_pc_probe_port() creates the own 'parport_pc' device if the device argument is NULL. Then parport_pc_probe_port() doesn't initialize the dma_mask and coherent_dma_mask of the device and calls dma_alloc_coherent with it. dma_alloc_coherent fails because dma_alloc_coherent() doesn't accept the uninitialized dma_mask: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/16/150 Long ago, X86_32 and X86_64 had the own dma_alloc_coherent implementations; X86_32 accepted a device having dma_mask that is not initialized however X86_64 didn't. When we merged them, we chose to prohibit a device having dma_mask that is not initialized. I think that it's good to require drivers to set up dma_mask (and coherent_dma_mask) properly if the drivers want DMA. Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Reported-by: Malcom Blaney <malcolm.blaney@maptek.com.au> Tested-by: Malcom Blaney <malcolm.blaney@maptek.com.au> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/slub.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions