summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm/swap.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>2021-09-25 00:43:47 +0200
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2021-09-25 01:13:35 +0200
commit243418e3925d5b5b0657ae54c322d43035e97eed (patch)
tree5cfbc50ba58f0bfca373305e2e9b233d3b35065d /mm/swap.c
parentlib/zlib_inflate/inffast: check config in C to avoid unused function warning (diff)
downloadlinux-243418e3925d5b5b0657ae54c322d43035e97eed.tar.xz
linux-243418e3925d5b5b0657ae54c322d43035e97eed.zip
mm: fs: invalidate bh_lrus for only cold path
The kernel test robot reported the regression of fio.write_iops[1] with commit 8cc621d2f45d ("mm: fs: invalidate BH LRU during page migration"). Since lru_add_drain is called frequently, invalidate bh_lrus there could increase bh_lrus cache miss ratio, which needs more IO in the end. This patch moves the bh_lrus invalidation from the hot path( e.g., zap_page_range, pagevec_release) to cold path(i.e., lru_add_drain_all, lru_cache_disable). Zhengjun Xing confirmed "I test the patch, the regression reduced to -2.9%" [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210520083144.GD14190@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/ [2] 8cc621d2f45d, mm: fs: invalidate BH LRU during page migration Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210907212347.1977686-1-minchan@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Goldsworthy <cgoldswo@codeaurora.org> Tested-by: "Xing, Zhengjun" <zhengjun.xing@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/swap.c')
-rw-r--r--mm/swap.c19
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index 897200d27dd0..af3cad4e5378 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -620,7 +620,6 @@ void lru_add_drain_cpu(int cpu)
pagevec_lru_move_fn(pvec, lru_lazyfree_fn);
activate_page_drain(cpu);
- invalidate_bh_lrus_cpu(cpu);
}
/**
@@ -703,6 +702,20 @@ void lru_add_drain(void)
local_unlock(&lru_pvecs.lock);
}
+/*
+ * It's called from per-cpu workqueue context in SMP case so
+ * lru_add_drain_cpu and invalidate_bh_lrus_cpu should run on
+ * the same cpu. It shouldn't be a problem in !SMP case since
+ * the core is only one and the locks will disable preemption.
+ */
+static void lru_add_and_bh_lrus_drain(void)
+{
+ local_lock(&lru_pvecs.lock);
+ lru_add_drain_cpu(smp_processor_id());
+ local_unlock(&lru_pvecs.lock);
+ invalidate_bh_lrus_cpu();
+}
+
void lru_add_drain_cpu_zone(struct zone *zone)
{
local_lock(&lru_pvecs.lock);
@@ -717,7 +730,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct work_struct, lru_add_drain_work);
static void lru_add_drain_per_cpu(struct work_struct *dummy)
{
- lru_add_drain();
+ lru_add_and_bh_lrus_drain();
}
/*
@@ -858,7 +871,7 @@ void lru_cache_disable(void)
*/
__lru_add_drain_all(true);
#else
- lru_add_drain();
+ lru_add_and_bh_lrus_drain();
#endif
}