usercopy: Check valid lifetime via stack depth

One of the things that CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY sanity-checks is whether
an object that is about to be copied to/from userspace is overlapping
the stack at all. If it is, it performs a number of inexpensive
bounds checks. One of the finer-grained checks is whether an object
crosses stack frames within the stack region. Doing this on x86 with
CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER was cheap/easy. Doing it with ORC was deemed too
heavy, and was left out (a while ago), leaving the courser whole-stack
check.

The LKDTM tests USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_TO and USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_FROM
try to exercise these cross-frame cases to validate the defense is
working. They have been failing ever since ORC was added (which was
expected). While Muhammad was investigating various LKDTM failures[1],
he asked me for additional details on them, and I realized that when
exact stack frame boundary checking is not available (i.e. everything
except x86 with FRAME_POINTER), it could check if a stack object is at
least "current depth valid", in the sense that any object within the
stack region but not between start-of-stack and current_stack_pointer
should be considered unavailable (i.e. its lifetime is from a call no
longer present on the stack).

Introduce ARCH_HAS_CURRENT_STACK_POINTER to track which architectures
have actually implemented the common global register alias.

Additionally report usercopy bounds checking failures with an offset
from current_stack_pointer, which may assist with diagnosing failures.

The LKDTM USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_TO and USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_FROM tests
(once slightly adjusted in a separate patch) pass again with this fixed.

[1] https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-project/issues/84

Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Reported-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220216201449.2087956-1-keescook@chromium.org
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220224060342.1855457-1-keescook@chromium.org
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220225173345.3358109-1-keescook@chromium.org
v4: - improve commit log (akpm)

1 files changed, 21 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/mm/usercopy.c b/mm/usercopy.c
index d0d268135d96..5d34c40c16c2 100644
--- a/mm/usercopy.c
+++ b/mm/usercopy.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
  * Returns:
  *	NOT_STACK: not at all on the stack
  *	GOOD_FRAME: fully within a valid stack frame
- *	GOOD_STACK: fully on the stack (when can't do frame-checking)
+ *	GOOD_STACK: within the current stack (when can't frame-check exactly)
  *	BAD_STACK: error condition (invalid stack position or bad stack frame)
  */
 static noinline int check_stack_object(const void *obj, unsigned long len)
@@ -55,6 +55,17 @@ static noinline int check_stack_object(const void *obj, unsigned long len)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	/* Finally, check stack depth if possible. */
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CURRENT_STACK_POINTER
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP)) {
+		if ((void *)current_stack_pointer < obj + len)
+			return BAD_STACK;
+	} else {
+		if (obj < (void *)current_stack_pointer)
+			return BAD_STACK;
+	}
+#endif
+
 	return GOOD_STACK;
 }
 
@@ -280,7 +291,15 @@ void __check_object_size(const void *ptr, unsigned long n, bool to_user)
 		 */
 		return;
 	default:
-		usercopy_abort("process stack", NULL, to_user, 0, n);
+		usercopy_abort("process stack", NULL, to_user,
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CURRENT_STACK_POINTER
+			IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP) ?
+				ptr - (void *)current_stack_pointer :
+				(void *)current_stack_pointer - ptr,
+#else
+			0,
+#endif
+			n);
 	}
 
 	/* Check for bad heap object. */