diff options
author | Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> | 2020-06-04 01:03:06 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2020-06-04 05:09:49 +0200 |
commit | 7cf111bc39f6792abedcdfbc4e6291a5603b0ef0 (patch) | |
tree | fb3462f50a495a95a6275100a61b30310d8e1faf /mm/vmscan.c | |
parent | mm: balance LRU lists based on relative thrashing (diff) | |
download | linux-7cf111bc39f6792abedcdfbc4e6291a5603b0ef0.tar.xz linux-7cf111bc39f6792abedcdfbc4e6291a5603b0ef0.zip |
mm: vmscan: determine anon/file pressure balance at the reclaim root
We split the LRU lists into anon and file, and we rebalance the scan
pressure between them when one of them begins thrashing: if the file cache
experiences workingset refaults, we increase the pressure on anonymous
pages; if the workload is stalled on swapins, we increase the pressure on
the file cache instead.
With cgroups and their nested LRU lists, we currently don't do this
correctly. While recursive cgroup reclaim establishes a relative LRU
order among the pages of all involved cgroups, LRU pressure balancing is
done on an individual cgroup LRU level. As a result, when one cgroup is
thrashing on the filesystem cache while a sibling may have cold anonymous
pages, pressure doesn't get equalized between them.
This patch moves LRU balancing decision to the root of reclaim - the same
level where the LRU order is established.
It does this by tracking LRU cost recursively, so that every level of the
cgroup tree knows the aggregate LRU cost of all memory within its domain.
When the page scanner calculates the scan balance for any given individual
cgroup's LRU list, it uses the values from the ancestor cgroup that
initiated the reclaim cycle.
If one sibling is then thrashing on the cache, it will tip the pressure
balance inside its ancestors, and the next hierarchical reclaim iteration
will go more after the anon pages in the tree.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520232525.798933-13-hannes@cmpxchg.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/vmscan.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/vmscan.c | 41 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 76e823db21a7..d08640f0235c 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -79,6 +79,12 @@ struct scan_control { */ struct mem_cgroup *target_mem_cgroup; + /* + * Scan pressure balancing between anon and file LRUs + */ + unsigned long anon_cost; + unsigned long file_cost; + /* Can active pages be deactivated as part of reclaim? */ #define DEACTIVATE_ANON 1 #define DEACTIVATE_FILE 2 @@ -2231,10 +2237,8 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int swappiness = mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg); u64 fraction[2]; u64 denominator = 0; /* gcc */ - struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec); unsigned long anon_prio, file_prio; enum scan_balance scan_balance; - unsigned long anon, file; unsigned long totalcost; unsigned long ap, fp; enum lru_list lru; @@ -2285,7 +2289,6 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, } scan_balance = SCAN_FRACT; - /* * Calculate the pressure balance between anon and file pages. * @@ -2300,30 +2303,12 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, anon_prio = swappiness; file_prio = 200 - anon_prio; - /* - * Because workloads change over time (and to avoid overflow) - * we keep these statistics as a floating average, which ends - * up weighing recent refaults more than old ones. - */ - - anon = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON, MAX_NR_ZONES) + - lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON, MAX_NR_ZONES); - file = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_ACTIVE_FILE, MAX_NR_ZONES) + - lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE, MAX_NR_ZONES); - - spin_lock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock); - totalcost = lruvec->anon_cost + lruvec->file_cost; - if (unlikely(totalcost > (anon + file) / 4)) { - lruvec->anon_cost /= 2; - lruvec->file_cost /= 2; - totalcost /= 2; - } + totalcost = sc->anon_cost + sc->file_cost; ap = anon_prio * (totalcost + 1); - ap /= lruvec->anon_cost + 1; + ap /= sc->anon_cost + 1; fp = file_prio * (totalcost + 1); - fp /= lruvec->file_cost + 1; - spin_unlock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock); + fp /= sc->file_cost + 1; fraction[0] = ap; fraction[1] = fp; @@ -2688,6 +2673,14 @@ again: nr_scanned = sc->nr_scanned; /* + * Determine the scan balance between anon and file LRUs. + */ + spin_lock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock); + sc->anon_cost = target_lruvec->anon_cost; + sc->file_cost = target_lruvec->file_cost; + spin_unlock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock); + + /* * Target desirable inactive:active list ratios for the anon * and file LRU lists. */ |