diff options
author | Pavel Mironchik <tibor0@gmail.com> | 2006-09-01 06:27:47 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org> | 2006-09-01 20:39:09 +0200 |
commit | 0b1d647a02c5a1b67d45287eeb6cb3b2219c41c3 (patch) | |
tree | 13f9caa7b0ebd17dff481f854ac8803aae01234f /mm | |
parent | [PATCH] schedule obsolete OSS drivers for removal, 2nd round (diff) | |
download | linux-0b1d647a02c5a1b67d45287eeb6cb3b2219c41c3.tar.xz linux-0b1d647a02c5a1b67d45287eeb6cb3b2219c41c3.zip |
[PATCH] dm: work around mempool_alloc, bio_alloc_bioset deadlocks
This patch works around a complex dm-related deadlock/livelock down in the
mempool allocator.
Alasdair said:
Several dm targets suffer from this.
Mempools are not yet used correctly everywhere in device-mapper: they can
get shared when devices are stacked, and some targets share them across
multiple instances. I made fixing this one of the prerequisites for this
patch:
md-dm-reduce-stack-usage-with-stacked-block-devices.patch
which in some cases makes people more likely to hit the problem.
There's been some progress on this recently with (unfinished) dm-crypt
patches at:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/agk/patches/2.6/editing/
(dm-crypt-move-io-to-workqueue.patch plus dependencies)
and:
I've no problems with a temporary workaround like that, but Milan Broz (a
new Redhat developer in the Czech Republic) has started reviewing all the
mempool usage in device-mapper so I'm expecting we'll soon have a proper fix
for this associated problems. [He's back from holiday at the start of next
week.]
For now, this sad-but-safe little patch will allow the machine to recover.
[akpm@osdl.org: rewrote changelog]
Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/mempool.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/mm/mempool.c b/mm/mempool.c index fe6e05289cc5..ccd8cb8cd41f 100644 --- a/mm/mempool.c +++ b/mm/mempool.c @@ -238,8 +238,13 @@ repeat_alloc: init_wait(&wait); prepare_to_wait(&pool->wait, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); smp_mb(); - if (!pool->curr_nr) - io_schedule(); + if (!pool->curr_nr) { + /* + * FIXME: this should be io_schedule(). The timeout is there + * as a workaround for some DM problems in 2.6.18. + */ + io_schedule_timeout(5*HZ); + } finish_wait(&pool->wait, &wait); goto repeat_alloc; |