summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>2022-07-02 05:35:21 +0200
committerakpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>2022-07-30 03:07:14 +0200
commitd6e103a757fa7876e7ded76128d5dffe12402ab9 (patch)
tree5ea391af7dacedee1b69273a4f5f1eb5edb74826 /mm
parentfilemap: minor cleanup for filemap_write_and_wait_range (diff)
downloadlinux-d6e103a757fa7876e7ded76128d5dffe12402ab9.tar.xz
linux-d6e103a757fa7876e7ded76128d5dffe12402ab9.zip
mm: memcontrol: do not miss MEMCG_MAX events for enforced allocations
Yafang Shao reported an issue related to the accounting of bpf memory: if a bpf map is charged indirectly for memory consumed from an interrupt context and allocations are enforced, MEMCG_MAX events are not raised. It's not/less of an issue in a generic case because consequent allocations from a process context will trigger the direct reclaim and MEMCG_MAX events will be raised. However a bpf map can belong to a dying/abandoned memory cgroup, so there will be no allocations from a process context and no MEMCG_MAX events will be triggered. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220702033521.64630-1-roman.gushchin@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Reported-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r--mm/memcontrol.c9
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index c5bfb3eacd08..767f49a6b987 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2577,6 +2577,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
bool passed_oom = false;
bool may_swap = true;
bool drained = false;
+ bool raised_max_event = false;
unsigned long pflags;
retry:
@@ -2616,6 +2617,7 @@ retry:
goto nomem;
memcg_memory_event(mem_over_limit, MEMCG_MAX);
+ raised_max_event = true;
psi_memstall_enter(&pflags);
nr_reclaimed = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem_over_limit, nr_pages,
@@ -2683,6 +2685,13 @@ nomem:
return -ENOMEM;
force:
/*
+ * If the allocation has to be enforced, don't forget to raise
+ * a MEMCG_MAX event.
+ */
+ if (!raised_max_event)
+ memcg_memory_event(mem_over_limit, MEMCG_MAX);
+
+ /*
* The allocation either can't fail or will lead to more memory
* being freed very soon. Allow memory usage go over the limit
* temporarily by force charging it.