summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>2024-02-27 18:42:45 +0100
committerAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>2024-03-05 02:01:25 +0100
commitbc2ff4cbc3294c01f29449405c42ee26ee0e1f59 (patch)
tree551f9a02091ff7a5c94fafae743618d3ab4eaffb /mm
parentmm: allow non-hugetlb large folios to be batch processed (diff)
downloadlinux-bc2ff4cbc3294c01f29449405c42ee26ee0e1f59.tar.xz
linux-bc2ff4cbc3294c01f29449405c42ee26ee0e1f59.zip
mm: free folios in a batch in shrink_folio_list()
Use free_unref_page_batch() to free the folios. This may increase the number of IPIs from calling try_to_unmap_flush() more often, but that's going to be very workload-dependent. It may even reduce the number of IPIs as we now batch-free large folios instead of freeing them one at a time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-12-willy@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r--mm/vmscan.c20
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index dcfbe617e9ef..144879d5bb89 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1006,14 +1006,15 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc,
struct reclaim_stat *stat, bool ignore_references)
{
+ struct folio_batch free_folios;
LIST_HEAD(ret_folios);
- LIST_HEAD(free_folios);
LIST_HEAD(demote_folios);
unsigned int nr_reclaimed = 0;
unsigned int pgactivate = 0;
bool do_demote_pass;
struct swap_iocb *plug = NULL;
+ folio_batch_init(&free_folios);
memset(stat, 0, sizeof(*stat));
cond_resched();
do_demote_pass = can_demote(pgdat->node_id, sc);
@@ -1412,14 +1413,11 @@ free_it:
*/
nr_reclaimed += nr_pages;
- /*
- * Is there need to periodically free_folio_list? It would
- * appear not as the counts should be low
- */
- if (unlikely(folio_test_large(folio)))
- destroy_large_folio(folio);
- else
- list_add(&folio->lru, &free_folios);
+ if (folio_batch_add(&free_folios, folio) == 0) {
+ mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios(&free_folios);
+ try_to_unmap_flush();
+ free_unref_folios(&free_folios);
+ }
continue;
activate_locked_split:
@@ -1483,9 +1481,9 @@ keep:
pgactivate = stat->nr_activate[0] + stat->nr_activate[1];
- mem_cgroup_uncharge_list(&free_folios);
+ mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios(&free_folios);
try_to_unmap_flush();
- free_unref_page_list(&free_folios);
+ free_unref_folios(&free_folios);
list_splice(&ret_folios, folio_list);
count_vm_events(PGACTIVATE, pgactivate);