diff options
author | Hong Zhiguo <zhiguohong@tencent.com> | 2013-09-14 16:42:28 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2013-09-16 04:03:33 +0200 |
commit | 716ec052d2280d511e10e90ad54a86f5b5d4dcc2 (patch) | |
tree | d1746e5302a4bfcd86d1155e0f4882b0b8e07fa4 /net/bridge | |
parent | bridge: use br_port_get_rtnl within rtnl lock (diff) | |
download | linux-716ec052d2280d511e10e90ad54a86f5b5d4dcc2.tar.xz linux-716ec052d2280d511e10e90ad54a86f5b5d4dcc2.zip |
bridge: fix NULL pointer deref of br_port_get_rcu
The NULL deref happens when br_handle_frame is called between these
2 lines of del_nbp:
dev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_BRIDGE_PORT;
/* --> br_handle_frame is called at this time */
netdev_rx_handler_unregister(dev);
In br_handle_frame the return of br_port_get_rcu(dev) is dereferenced
without check but br_port_get_rcu(dev) returns NULL if:
!(dev->priv_flags & IFF_BRIDGE_PORT)
Eric Dumazet pointed out the testing of IFF_BRIDGE_PORT is not necessary
here since we're in rcu_read_lock and we have synchronize_net() in
netdev_rx_handler_unregister. So remove the testing of IFF_BRIDGE_PORT
and by the previous patch, make sure br_port_get_rcu is called in
bridging code.
Signed-off-by: Hong Zhiguo <zhiguohong@tencent.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/bridge')
-rw-r--r-- | net/bridge/br_private.h | 5 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h index dd583177cba4..efb57d911569 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h @@ -202,10 +202,7 @@ struct net_bridge_port static inline struct net_bridge_port *br_port_get_rcu(const struct net_device *dev) { - struct net_bridge_port *port = - rcu_dereference_rtnl(dev->rx_handler_data); - - return br_port_exists(dev) ? port : NULL; + return rcu_dereference(dev->rx_handler_data); } static inline struct net_bridge_port *br_port_get_rtnl(const struct net_device *dev) |