summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/can/af_can.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorOliver Hartkopp <oliver@hartkopp.net>2008-12-04 00:52:35 +0100
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2008-12-04 00:52:35 +0100
commitd253eee20195b25e298bf162a6e72f14bf4803e5 (patch)
tree4fd5fef75d52ecae3f41dbd9ae62436e917e1699 /net/can/af_can.c
parentPhonet: do not dump addresses from other namespaces (diff)
downloadlinux-d253eee20195b25e298bf162a6e72f14bf4803e5.tar.xz
linux-d253eee20195b25e298bf162a6e72f14bf4803e5.zip
can: Fix CAN_(EFF|RTR)_FLAG handling in can_filter
Due to a wrong safety check in af_can.c it was not possible to filter for SFF frames with a specific CAN identifier without getting the same selected CAN identifier from a received EFF frame also. This fix has a minimum (but user visible) impact on the CAN filter API and therefore the CAN version is set to a new date. Indeed the 'old' API is still working as-is. But when now setting CAN_(EFF|RTR)_FLAG in can_filter.can_mask you might get less traffic than before - but still the stuff that you expected to get for your defined filter ... Thanks to Kurt Van Dijck for pointing at this issue and for the review. Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@hartkopp.net> Acked-by: Kurt Van Dijck <kurt.van.dijck@eia.be> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/can/af_can.c')
-rw-r--r--net/can/af_can.c63
1 files changed, 48 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/net/can/af_can.c b/net/can/af_can.c
index 7d4d2b3c137e..d8173e50cb87 100644
--- a/net/can/af_can.c
+++ b/net/can/af_can.c
@@ -319,23 +319,52 @@ static struct dev_rcv_lists *find_dev_rcv_lists(struct net_device *dev)
return n ? d : NULL;
}
+/**
+ * find_rcv_list - determine optimal filterlist inside device filter struct
+ * @can_id: pointer to CAN identifier of a given can_filter
+ * @mask: pointer to CAN mask of a given can_filter
+ * @d: pointer to the device filter struct
+ *
+ * Description:
+ * Returns the optimal filterlist to reduce the filter handling in the
+ * receive path. This function is called by service functions that need
+ * to register or unregister a can_filter in the filter lists.
+ *
+ * A filter matches in general, when
+ *
+ * <received_can_id> & mask == can_id & mask
+ *
+ * so every bit set in the mask (even CAN_EFF_FLAG, CAN_RTR_FLAG) describe
+ * relevant bits for the filter.
+ *
+ * The filter can be inverted (CAN_INV_FILTER bit set in can_id) or it can
+ * filter for error frames (CAN_ERR_FLAG bit set in mask). For error frames
+ * there is a special filterlist and a special rx path filter handling.
+ *
+ * Return:
+ * Pointer to optimal filterlist for the given can_id/mask pair.
+ * Constistency checked mask.
+ * Reduced can_id to have a preprocessed filter compare value.
+ */
static struct hlist_head *find_rcv_list(canid_t *can_id, canid_t *mask,
struct dev_rcv_lists *d)
{
canid_t inv = *can_id & CAN_INV_FILTER; /* save flag before masking */
- /* filter error frames */
+ /* filter for error frames in extra filterlist */
if (*mask & CAN_ERR_FLAG) {
- /* clear CAN_ERR_FLAG in list entry */
+ /* clear CAN_ERR_FLAG in filter entry */
*mask &= CAN_ERR_MASK;
return &d->rx[RX_ERR];
}
- /* ensure valid values in can_mask */
- if (*mask & CAN_EFF_FLAG)
- *mask &= (CAN_EFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG);
- else
- *mask &= (CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_RTR_FLAG);
+ /* with cleared CAN_ERR_FLAG we have a simple mask/value filterpair */
+
+#define CAN_EFF_RTR_FLAGS (CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG)
+
+ /* ensure valid values in can_mask for 'SFF only' frame filtering */
+ if ((*mask & CAN_EFF_FLAG) && !(*can_id & CAN_EFF_FLAG))
+ *mask &= (CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_RTR_FLAGS);
/* reduce condition testing at receive time */
*can_id &= *mask;
@@ -348,15 +377,19 @@ static struct hlist_head *find_rcv_list(canid_t *can_id, canid_t *mask,
if (!(*mask))
return &d->rx[RX_ALL];
- /* use extra filterset for the subscription of exactly *ONE* can_id */
- if (*can_id & CAN_EFF_FLAG) {
- if (*mask == (CAN_EFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG)) {
- /* RFC: a use-case for hash-tables in the future? */
- return &d->rx[RX_EFF];
+ /* extra filterlists for the subscription of a single non-RTR can_id */
+ if (((*mask & CAN_EFF_RTR_FLAGS) == CAN_EFF_RTR_FLAGS)
+ && !(*can_id & CAN_RTR_FLAG)) {
+
+ if (*can_id & CAN_EFF_FLAG) {
+ if (*mask == (CAN_EFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_RTR_FLAGS)) {
+ /* RFC: a future use-case for hash-tables? */
+ return &d->rx[RX_EFF];
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (*mask == (CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_RTR_FLAGS))
+ return &d->rx_sff[*can_id];
}
- } else {
- if (*mask == CAN_SFF_MASK)
- return &d->rx_sff[*can_id];
}
/* default: filter via can_id/can_mask */