summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/ceph
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>2012-06-01 05:22:18 +0200
committerAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>2012-06-20 14:43:49 +0200
commit88ed6ea0b295f8e2383d599a04027ec596cdf97b (patch)
treee9a49af02373e76a9ce0ed94b4120ccc184a7461 /net/ceph
parentlibceph: osd_client: don't drop reply reference too early (diff)
downloadlinux-88ed6ea0b295f8e2383d599a04027ec596cdf97b.tar.xz
linux-88ed6ea0b295f8e2383d599a04027ec596cdf97b.zip
libceph: use con get/put ops from osd_client
There were a few direct calls to ceph_con_{get,put}() instead of the con ops from osd_client.c. This is a bug since those ops aren't defined to be ceph_con_get/put. This breaks refcounting on the ceph_osd structs that contain the ceph_connections, and could lead to all manner of strangeness. The purpose of the ->get and ->put methods in a ceph connection are to allow the connection to indicate it has a reference to something external to the messaging system, *not* to indicate something external has a reference to the connection. [elder@inktank.com: added that last sentence] Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com> (cherry picked from commit 0d47766f14211a73eaf54cab234db134ece79f49)
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ceph')
-rw-r--r--net/ceph/osd_client.c8
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/net/ceph/osd_client.c b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
index 13538da41dd6..ca59e66c9787 100644
--- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c
+++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ void ceph_osdc_release_request(struct kref *kref)
req->r_pages, req->r_con_filling_msg);
ceph_con_revoke_message(req->r_con_filling_msg,
req->r_reply);
- ceph_con_put(req->r_con_filling_msg);
+ req->r_con_filling_msg->ops->put(req->r_con_filling_msg);
}
if (req->r_reply)
ceph_msg_put(req->r_reply);
@@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@ static void handle_reply(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc, struct ceph_msg *msg,
if (req->r_con_filling_msg == con && req->r_reply == msg) {
dout(" dropping con_filling_msg ref %p\n", con);
req->r_con_filling_msg = NULL;
- ceph_con_put(con);
+ con->ops->put(con);
}
if (!req->r_got_reply) {
@@ -2028,7 +2028,7 @@ static struct ceph_msg *get_reply(struct ceph_connection *con,
dout("get_reply revoking msg %p from old con %p\n",
req->r_reply, req->r_con_filling_msg);
ceph_con_revoke_message(req->r_con_filling_msg, req->r_reply);
- ceph_con_put(req->r_con_filling_msg);
+ req->r_con_filling_msg->ops->put(req->r_con_filling_msg);
req->r_con_filling_msg = NULL;
}
@@ -2063,7 +2063,7 @@ static struct ceph_msg *get_reply(struct ceph_connection *con,
#endif
}
*skip = 0;
- req->r_con_filling_msg = ceph_con_get(con);
+ req->r_con_filling_msg = con->ops->get(con);
dout("get_reply tid %lld %p\n", tid, m);
out: