summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/ceph
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>2019-02-05 20:30:27 +0100
committerIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>2019-02-18 18:05:33 +0100
commit0fd3fd0a9bb0b02b6435bb7070e9f7b82a23f068 (patch)
tree07cd4e55be55374bfd563067e84d9c0dd1ecce58 /net/ceph
parentLinux 5.0-rc7 (diff)
downloadlinux-0fd3fd0a9bb0b02b6435bb7070e9f7b82a23f068.tar.xz
linux-0fd3fd0a9bb0b02b6435bb7070e9f7b82a23f068.zip
libceph: handle an empty authorize reply
The authorize reply can be empty, for example when the ticket used to build the authorizer is too old and TAG_BADAUTHORIZER is returned from the service. Calling ->verify_authorizer_reply() results in an attempt to decrypt and validate (somewhat) random data in au->buf (most likely the signature block from calc_signature()), which fails and ends up in con_fault_finish() with !con->auth_retry. The ticket isn't invalidated and the connection is retried again and again until a new ticket is obtained from the monitor: libceph: osd2 192.168.122.1:6809 bad authorize reply libceph: osd2 192.168.122.1:6809 bad authorize reply libceph: osd2 192.168.122.1:6809 bad authorize reply libceph: osd2 192.168.122.1:6809 bad authorize reply Let TAG_BADAUTHORIZER handler kick in and increment con->auth_retry. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 5c056fdc5b47 ("libceph: verify authorize reply on connect") Link: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/20164 Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ceph')
-rw-r--r--net/ceph/messenger.c15
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/net/ceph/messenger.c b/net/ceph/messenger.c
index 3661cdd927f1..7e71b0df1fbc 100644
--- a/net/ceph/messenger.c
+++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c
@@ -2058,6 +2058,8 @@ static int process_connect(struct ceph_connection *con)
dout("process_connect on %p tag %d\n", con, (int)con->in_tag);
if (con->auth) {
+ int len = le32_to_cpu(con->in_reply.authorizer_len);
+
/*
* Any connection that defines ->get_authorizer()
* should also define ->add_authorizer_challenge() and
@@ -2067,8 +2069,7 @@ static int process_connect(struct ceph_connection *con)
*/
if (con->in_reply.tag == CEPH_MSGR_TAG_CHALLENGE_AUTHORIZER) {
ret = con->ops->add_authorizer_challenge(
- con, con->auth->authorizer_reply_buf,
- le32_to_cpu(con->in_reply.authorizer_len));
+ con, con->auth->authorizer_reply_buf, len);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
@@ -2078,10 +2079,12 @@ static int process_connect(struct ceph_connection *con)
return 0;
}
- ret = con->ops->verify_authorizer_reply(con);
- if (ret < 0) {
- con->error_msg = "bad authorize reply";
- return ret;
+ if (len) {
+ ret = con->ops->verify_authorizer_reply(con);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ con->error_msg = "bad authorize reply";
+ return ret;
+ }
}
}