netpoll: fix rx_hook() interface by passing the skb

Right now skb->data is passed to rx_hook() even if the skb
has not been linearised and without giving rx_hook() a way
to linearise it.

Change the rx_hook() interface and make it accept the skb
and the offset to the UDP payload as arguments. rx_hook() is
also renamed to rx_skb_hook() to ensure that out of the tree
users notice the API change.

In this way any rx_skb_hook() implementation can perform all
the needed operations to properly (and safely) access the
skb data.

Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@meshcoding.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 18 insertions, 13 deletions

diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
index fc75c9e461b8..8f971990677c 100644
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
@@ -636,8 +636,9 @@ static void netpoll_neigh_reply(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo
 
 			netpoll_send_skb(np, send_skb);
 
-			/* If there are several rx_hooks for the same address,
-			   we're fine by sending a single reply */
+			/* If there are several rx_skb_hooks for the same
+			 * address we're fine by sending a single reply
+			 */
 			break;
 		}
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&npinfo->rx_lock, flags);
@@ -719,8 +720,9 @@ static void netpoll_neigh_reply(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo
 
 			netpoll_send_skb(np, send_skb);
 
-			/* If there are several rx_hooks for the same address,
-			   we're fine by sending a single reply */
+			/* If there are several rx_skb_hooks for the same
+			 * address, we're fine by sending a single reply
+			 */
 			break;
 		}
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&npinfo->rx_lock, flags);
@@ -756,11 +758,12 @@ static bool pkt_is_ns(struct sk_buff *skb)
 
 int __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo)
 {
-	int proto, len, ulen;
-	int hits = 0;
+	int proto, len, ulen, data_len;
+	int hits = 0, offset;
 	const struct iphdr *iph;
 	struct udphdr *uh;
 	struct netpoll *np, *tmp;
+	uint16_t source;
 
 	if (list_empty(&npinfo->rx_np))
 		goto out;
@@ -820,7 +823,10 @@ int __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo)
 
 		len -= iph->ihl*4;
 		uh = (struct udphdr *)(((char *)iph) + iph->ihl*4);
+		offset = (unsigned char *)(uh + 1) - skb->data;
 		ulen = ntohs(uh->len);
+		data_len = skb->len - offset;
+		source = ntohs(uh->source);
 
 		if (ulen != len)
 			goto out;
@@ -834,9 +840,7 @@ int __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo)
 			if (np->local_port && np->local_port != ntohs(uh->dest))
 				continue;
 
-			np->rx_hook(np, ntohs(uh->source),
-				       (char *)(uh+1),
-				       ulen - sizeof(struct udphdr));
+			np->rx_skb_hook(np, source, skb, offset, data_len);
 			hits++;
 		}
 	} else {
@@ -859,7 +863,10 @@ int __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo)
 		if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, sizeof(struct udphdr)))
 			goto out;
 		uh = udp_hdr(skb);
+		offset = (unsigned char *)(uh + 1) - skb->data;
 		ulen = ntohs(uh->len);
+		data_len = skb->len - offset;
+		source = ntohs(uh->source);
 		if (ulen != skb->len)
 			goto out;
 		if (udp6_csum_init(skb, uh, IPPROTO_UDP))
@@ -872,9 +879,7 @@ int __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo)
 			if (np->local_port && np->local_port != ntohs(uh->dest))
 				continue;
 
-			np->rx_hook(np, ntohs(uh->source),
-				       (char *)(uh+1),
-				       ulen - sizeof(struct udphdr));
+			np->rx_skb_hook(np, source, skb, offset, data_len);
 			hits++;
 		}
 #endif
@@ -1062,7 +1067,7 @@ int __netpoll_setup(struct netpoll *np, struct net_device *ndev, gfp_t gfp)
 
 	npinfo->netpoll = np;
 
-	if (np->rx_hook) {
+	if (np->rx_skb_hook) {
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&npinfo->rx_lock, flags);
 		npinfo->rx_flags |= NETPOLL_RX_ENABLED;
 		list_add_tail(&np->rx, &npinfo->rx_np);