summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>2009-03-14 15:23:01 +0100
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2009-03-16 04:09:51 +0100
commit5861f8e58dd84fc34b691c2e8d4824dea68c360e (patch)
tree5c202f6866cca91ded45213cbb1a3d7f75fc6749 /net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
parentpkt_sched: Change misleading code in class delete. (diff)
downloadlinux-5861f8e58dd84fc34b691c2e8d4824dea68c360e.tar.xz
linux-5861f8e58dd84fc34b691c2e8d4824dea68c360e.zip
tcp: remove pointless .dsack/.num_sacks code
In the pure assignment case, the earlier zeroing is still in effect. David S. Miller raised concerns if the ifs are there to avoid dirtying cachelines. I came to these conclusions: > We'll be dirty it anyway (now that I check), the first "real" statement > in tcp_rcv_established is: > > tp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp = 0; > > ...that'll land on the same dword. :-/ > > I suppose the blocks are there just because they had more complexity > inside when they had to calculate the eff_sacks too (maybe it would > have been better to just remove them in that drop-patch so you would > have had less head-ache :-)). Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ipv4/tcp_input.c')
-rw-r--r--net/ipv4/tcp_input.c7
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 5ecd7aa25979..cd39d1d02dc3 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -4248,8 +4248,7 @@ static void tcp_sack_remove(struct tcp_sock *tp)
this_sack++;
sp++;
}
- if (num_sacks != tp->rx_opt.num_sacks)
- tp->rx_opt.num_sacks = num_sacks;
+ tp->rx_opt.num_sacks = num_sacks;
}
/* This one checks to see if we can put data from the
@@ -4325,8 +4324,7 @@ static void tcp_data_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
TCP_ECN_accept_cwr(tp, skb);
- if (tp->rx_opt.dsack)
- tp->rx_opt.dsack = 0;
+ tp->rx_opt.dsack = 0;
/* Queue data for delivery to the user.
* Packets in sequence go to the receive queue.
@@ -4445,7 +4443,6 @@ drop:
/* Initial out of order segment, build 1 SACK. */
if (tcp_is_sack(tp)) {
tp->rx_opt.num_sacks = 1;
- tp->rx_opt.dsack = 0;
tp->selective_acks[0].start_seq = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq;
tp->selective_acks[0].end_seq =
TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq;