summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/ipv4
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>2011-01-11 02:14:22 +0100
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2011-01-11 23:03:07 +0100
commitc191a836a908d1dd6b40c503741f91b914de3348 (patch)
tree98ab4ed7316d55bb014f758e590fec2811694f30 /net/ipv4
parentnet/r8169: Update the function of parsing firmware (diff)
downloadlinux-c191a836a908d1dd6b40c503741f91b914de3348.tar.xz
linux-c191a836a908d1dd6b40c503741f91b914de3348.zip
tcp: disallow bind() to reuse addr/port
inet_csk_bind_conflict() logic currently disallows a bind() if it finds a friend socket (a socket bound on same address/port) satisfying a set of conditions : 1) Current (to be bound) socket doesnt have sk_reuse set OR 2) other socket doesnt have sk_reuse set OR 3) other socket is in LISTEN state We should add the CLOSE state in the 3) condition, in order to avoid two REUSEADDR sockets in CLOSE state with same local address/port, since this can deny further operations. Note : a prior patch tried to address the problem in a different (and buggy) way. (commit fda48a0d7a8412ced tcp: bind() fix when many ports are bound). Reported-by: Gaspar Chilingarov <gasparch@gmail.com> Reported-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@gmail.com> Tested-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ipv4')
-rw-r--r--net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c5
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
index 25e318153f14..97e5fb765265 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ int inet_csk_bind_conflict(const struct sock *sk,
!sk2->sk_bound_dev_if ||
sk->sk_bound_dev_if == sk2->sk_bound_dev_if)) {
if (!reuse || !sk2->sk_reuse ||
- sk2->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
+ ((1 << sk2->sk_state) & (TCPF_LISTEN | TCPF_CLOSE))) {
const __be32 sk2_rcv_saddr = sk_rcv_saddr(sk2);
if (!sk2_rcv_saddr || !sk_rcv_saddr(sk) ||
sk2_rcv_saddr == sk_rcv_saddr(sk))
@@ -122,7 +122,8 @@ again:
(tb->num_owners < smallest_size || smallest_size == -1)) {
smallest_size = tb->num_owners;
smallest_rover = rover;
- if (atomic_read(&hashinfo->bsockets) > (high - low) + 1) {
+ if (atomic_read(&hashinfo->bsockets) > (high - low) + 1 &&
+ !inet_csk(sk)->icsk_af_ops->bind_conflict(sk, tb)) {
spin_unlock(&head->lock);
snum = smallest_rover;
goto have_snum;