summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/mac80211/scan.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>2009-04-29 12:26:17 +0200
committerJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>2009-05-06 21:14:51 +0200
commit5cff20e6c5a6591a79d3b027af222870f52bb550 (patch)
tree81b6ebb75c1dc87b65258e71526c1581d168156c /net/mac80211/scan.c
parentmac80211: Warn if the rate controller requests retries for a NO_ACK frame (diff)
downloadlinux-5cff20e6c5a6591a79d3b027af222870f52bb550.tar.xz
linux-5cff20e6c5a6591a79d3b027af222870f52bb550.zip
mac80211: tell driver when idle
When we aren't doing anything in mac80211, we can turn off much of the hardware, depending on the driver/hw. Not doing anything, aka being idle, means: * no monitor interfaces * no AP/mesh/wds interfaces * any station interfaces are in DISABLED state * any IBSS interfaces aren't trying to be in a network * we aren't trying to scan By creating a new function that verifies these conditions and calling it at strategic points where the states of those conditions change, we can easily make mac80211 tell the driver when we are idle to save power. Additionally, this fixes a small quirk where a recalculated powersave state is passed to the driver even if the hardware is about to stopped completely. This patch intentionally doesn't touch radio_enabled because that is currently implemented to be a soft rfkill which is inappropriate here when we need to be able to wake up with low latency. One thing I'm not entirely sure about is this: phy0: device no longer idle - in use wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:11:24:91:07:4d try 1 wlan0 direct probe responded wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:11:24:91:07:4d wlan0: authenticated > phy0: device now idle > phy0: device no longer idle - in use wlan0: associate with AP 00:11:24:91:07:4d wlan0: RX AssocResp from 00:11:24:91:07:4d (capab=0x401 status=0 aid=1) wlan0: associated Is it appropriate to go into idle state for a short time when we have just authenticated, but not associated yet? This happens only with the userspace SME, because we cannot really know how long it will wait before asking us to associate. Would going idle after a short timeout be more appropriate? We may need to revisit this, depending on what happens. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/mac80211/scan.c')
-rw-r--r--net/mac80211/scan.c17
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/net/mac80211/scan.c b/net/mac80211/scan.c
index 127bd54e0e38..c99ef8d04d3d 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/scan.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/scan.c
@@ -302,17 +302,9 @@ void ieee80211_scan_completed(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, bool aborted)
/* we only have to protect scan_req and hw/sw scan */
mutex_unlock(&local->scan_mtx);
- if (was_hw_scan) {
- /*
- * Somebody might have requested channel change during scan
- * that we won't have acted upon, try now. ieee80211_hw_config
- * will set the flag based on actual changes.
- */
- ieee80211_hw_config(local, 0);
- goto done;
- }
-
ieee80211_hw_config(local, IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_CHANNEL);
+ if (was_hw_scan)
+ goto done;
netif_tx_lock_bh(local->mdev);
netif_addr_lock(local->mdev);
@@ -351,6 +343,7 @@ void ieee80211_scan_completed(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, bool aborted)
mutex_unlock(&local->iflist_mtx);
done:
+ ieee80211_recalc_idle(local);
ieee80211_mlme_notify_scan_completed(local);
ieee80211_ibss_notify_scan_completed(local);
ieee80211_mesh_notify_scan_completed(local);
@@ -471,6 +464,8 @@ static int __ieee80211_start_scan(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
* dependency, so that the scan completed calls
* have more locking freedom.
*/
+
+ ieee80211_recalc_idle(local);
mutex_unlock(&local->scan_mtx);
if (local->ops->hw_scan)
@@ -487,6 +482,8 @@ static int __ieee80211_start_scan(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
} else
local->sw_scanning = false;
+ ieee80211_recalc_idle(local);
+
local->scan_req = NULL;
local->scan_sdata = NULL;
}