diff options
author | Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> | 2020-04-11 21:05:01 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2020-04-13 06:04:08 +0200 |
commit | e154659ba39a1c2be576aaa0a5bda8088d707950 (patch) | |
tree | 35d3133115483b71105b54d15b5012fbe9ecfe5c /net/mptcp | |
parent | net: tun: record RX queue in skb before do_xdp_generic() (diff) | |
download | linux-e154659ba39a1c2be576aaa0a5bda8088d707950.tar.xz linux-e154659ba39a1c2be576aaa0a5bda8088d707950.zip |
mptcp: fix double-unlock in mptcp_poll
mptcp_connect/28740 is trying to release lock (sk_lock-AF_INET) at:
[<ffffffff82c15869>] mptcp_poll+0xb9/0x550
but there are no more locks to release!
Call Trace:
lock_release+0x50f/0x750
release_sock+0x171/0x1b0
mptcp_poll+0xb9/0x550
sock_poll+0x157/0x470
? get_net_ns+0xb0/0xb0
do_sys_poll+0x63c/0xdd0
Problem is that __mptcp_tcp_fallback() releases the mptcp socket lock,
but after recent change it doesn't do this in all of its return paths.
To fix this, remove the unlock from __mptcp_tcp_fallback() and
always do the unlock in the caller.
Also add a small comment as to why we have this
__mptcp_needs_tcp_fallback().
Fixes: 0b4f33def7bbde ("mptcp: fix tcp fallback crash")
Reported-by: syzbot+e56606435b7bfeea8cf5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/mptcp')
-rw-r--r-- | net/mptcp/protocol.c | 25 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c index 939a5045181a..9936e33ac351 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c @@ -97,12 +97,7 @@ static struct socket *__mptcp_tcp_fallback(struct mptcp_sock *msk) if (likely(!__mptcp_needs_tcp_fallback(msk))) return NULL; - if (msk->subflow) { - release_sock((struct sock *)msk); - return msk->subflow; - } - - return NULL; + return msk->subflow; } static bool __mptcp_can_create_subflow(const struct mptcp_sock *msk) @@ -734,9 +729,10 @@ static int mptcp_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len) goto out; } +fallback: ssock = __mptcp_tcp_fallback(msk); if (unlikely(ssock)) { -fallback: + release_sock(sk); pr_debug("fallback passthrough"); ret = sock_sendmsg(ssock, msg); return ret >= 0 ? ret + copied : (copied ? copied : ret); @@ -769,8 +765,14 @@ fallback: if (ret < 0) break; if (ret == 0 && unlikely(__mptcp_needs_tcp_fallback(msk))) { + /* Can happen for passive sockets: + * 3WHS negotiated MPTCP, but first packet after is + * plain TCP (e.g. due to middlebox filtering unknown + * options). + * + * Fall back to TCP. + */ release_sock(ssk); - ssock = __mptcp_tcp_fallback(msk); goto fallback; } @@ -883,6 +885,7 @@ static int mptcp_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, ssock = __mptcp_tcp_fallback(msk); if (unlikely(ssock)) { fallback: + release_sock(sk); pr_debug("fallback-read subflow=%p", mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssock->sk)); copied = sock_recvmsg(ssock, msg, flags); @@ -1467,12 +1470,11 @@ static int mptcp_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname, */ lock_sock(sk); ssock = __mptcp_tcp_fallback(msk); + release_sock(sk); if (ssock) return tcp_setsockopt(ssock->sk, level, optname, optval, optlen); - release_sock(sk); - return -EOPNOTSUPP; } @@ -1492,12 +1494,11 @@ static int mptcp_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname, */ lock_sock(sk); ssock = __mptcp_tcp_fallback(msk); + release_sock(sk); if (ssock) return tcp_getsockopt(ssock->sk, level, optname, optval, option); - release_sock(sk); - return -EOPNOTSUPP; } |