summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/nfc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>2022-12-02 22:44:14 +0100
committerJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>2022-12-06 02:46:25 +0100
commite329e71013c9b5a4535b099208493c7826ee4a64 (patch)
tree91dec2e30e570557d62c12ef81ef7efadb8d2971 /net/nfc
parentnet: mvneta: Prevent out of bounds read in mvneta_config_rss() (diff)
downloadlinux-e329e71013c9b5a4535b099208493c7826ee4a64.tar.xz
linux-e329e71013c9b5a4535b099208493c7826ee4a64.zip
NFC: nci: Bounds check struct nfc_target arrays
While running under CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, syzkaller reported: memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 129) of single field "target->sensf_res" at net/nfc/nci/ntf.c:260 (size 18) This appears to be a legitimate lack of bounds checking in nci_add_new_protocol(). Add the missing checks. Reported-by: syzbot+210e196cef4711b65139@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0000000000001c590f05ee7b3ff4@google.com Fixes: 019c4fbaa790 ("NFC: Add NCI multiple targets support") Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221202214410.never.693-kees@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/nfc')
-rw-r--r--net/nfc/nci/ntf.c6
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c b/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c
index 282c51051dcc..994a0a1efb58 100644
--- a/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c
+++ b/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c
@@ -240,6 +240,8 @@ static int nci_add_new_protocol(struct nci_dev *ndev,
target->sens_res = nfca_poll->sens_res;
target->sel_res = nfca_poll->sel_res;
target->nfcid1_len = nfca_poll->nfcid1_len;
+ if (target->nfcid1_len > ARRAY_SIZE(target->nfcid1))
+ return -EPROTO;
if (target->nfcid1_len > 0) {
memcpy(target->nfcid1, nfca_poll->nfcid1,
target->nfcid1_len);
@@ -248,6 +250,8 @@ static int nci_add_new_protocol(struct nci_dev *ndev,
nfcb_poll = (struct rf_tech_specific_params_nfcb_poll *)params;
target->sensb_res_len = nfcb_poll->sensb_res_len;
+ if (target->sensb_res_len > ARRAY_SIZE(target->sensb_res))
+ return -EPROTO;
if (target->sensb_res_len > 0) {
memcpy(target->sensb_res, nfcb_poll->sensb_res,
target->sensb_res_len);
@@ -256,6 +260,8 @@ static int nci_add_new_protocol(struct nci_dev *ndev,
nfcf_poll = (struct rf_tech_specific_params_nfcf_poll *)params;
target->sensf_res_len = nfcf_poll->sensf_res_len;
+ if (target->sensf_res_len > ARRAY_SIZE(target->sensf_res))
+ return -EPROTO;
if (target->sensf_res_len > 0) {
memcpy(target->sensf_res, nfcf_poll->sensf_res,
target->sensf_res_len);