packet: Protect packet sk list with mutex (v2)

Change since v1:

* Fixed inuse counters access spotted by Eric

In patch eea68e2f (packet: Report socket mclist info via diag module) I've
introduced a "scheduling in atomic" problem in packet diag module -- the
socket list is traversed under rcu_read_lock() while performed under it sk
mclist access requires rtnl lock (i.e. -- mutex) to be taken.

[152363.820563] BUG: scheduling while atomic: crtools/12517/0x10000002
[152363.820573] 4 locks held by crtools/12517:
[152363.820581]  #0:  (sock_diag_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81a2dcb5>] sock_diag_rcv+0x1f/0x3e
[152363.820613]  #1:  (sock_diag_table_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81a2de70>] sock_diag_rcv_msg+0xdb/0x11a
[152363.820644]  #2:  (nlk->cb_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81a67d01>] netlink_dump+0x23/0x1ab
[152363.820693]  #3:  (rcu_read_lock){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff81b6a049>] packet_diag_dump+0x0/0x1af

Similar thing was then re-introduced by further packet diag patches (fanount
mutex and pgvec mutex for rings) :(

Apart from being terribly sorry for the above, I propose to change the packet
sk list protection from spinlock to mutex. This lock currently protects two
modifications:

* sklist
* prot inuse counters

The sklist modifications can be just reprotected with mutex since they already
occur in a sleeping context. The inuse counters modifications are trickier -- the
__this_cpu_-s are used inside, thus requiring the caller to handle the potential
issues with contexts himself. Since packet sockets' counters are modified in two
places only (packet_create and packet_release) we only need to protect the context
from being preempted. BH disabling is not required in this case.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/net/packet/diag.c b/net/packet/diag.c
index bc33fbe8a5ef..39bce0d50df9 100644
--- a/net/packet/diag.c
+++ b/net/packet/diag.c
@@ -177,8 +177,8 @@ static int packet_diag_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 	net = sock_net(skb->sk);
 	req = nlmsg_data(cb->nlh);
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	sk_for_each_rcu(sk, node, &net->packet.sklist) {
+	mutex_lock(&net->packet.sklist_lock);
+	sk_for_each(sk, node, &net->packet.sklist) {
 		if (!net_eq(sock_net(sk), net))
 			continue;
 		if (num < s_num)
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ next:
 		num++;
 	}
 done:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
+	mutex_unlock(&net->packet.sklist_lock);
 	cb->args[0] = num;
 
 	return skb->len;