diff options
| author | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> | 2019-07-30 16:56:57 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2019-07-30 19:32:35 +0200 |
| commit | 1db88c5343712e411a2dd45375f27c477e33dc07 (patch) | |
| tree | 62ebbf283dc01704b5f9fa81475a527bfc038021 /net/rxrpc/insecure.c | |
| parent | Merge branch 'bnxt_en-TPA-57500' (diff) | |
| download | linux-1db88c5343712e411a2dd45375f27c477e33dc07.tar.xz linux-1db88c5343712e411a2dd45375f27c477e33dc07.zip | |
rxrpc: Fix -Wframe-larger-than= warnings from on-stack crypto
rxkad sometimes triggers a warning about oversized stack frames when
building with clang for a 32-bit architecture:
net/rxrpc/rxkad.c:243:12: error: stack frame size of 1088 bytes in function 'rxkad_secure_packet' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
net/rxrpc/rxkad.c:501:12: error: stack frame size of 1088 bytes in function 'rxkad_verify_packet' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
The problem is the combination of SYNC_SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK() in
rxkad_verify_packet()/rxkad_secure_packet() with the relatively large
scatterlist in rxkad_verify_packet_1()/rxkad_secure_packet_encrypt().
The warning does not show up when using gcc, which does not inline the
functions as aggressively, but the problem is still the same.
Allocate the cipher buffers from the slab instead, caching the allocated
packet crypto request memory used for DATA packet crypto in the rxrpc_call
struct.
Fixes: 17926a79320a ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both")
Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/rxrpc/insecure.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/rxrpc/insecure.c | 5 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/insecure.c b/net/rxrpc/insecure.c index a29d26c273b5..f6c59f5fae9d 100644 --- a/net/rxrpc/insecure.c +++ b/net/rxrpc/insecure.c @@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ static int none_verify_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb, return 0; } +static void none_free_call_crypto(struct rxrpc_call *call) +{ +} + static void none_locate_data(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int *_offset, unsigned int *_len) { @@ -83,6 +87,7 @@ const struct rxrpc_security rxrpc_no_security = { .exit = none_exit, .init_connection_security = none_init_connection_security, .prime_packet_security = none_prime_packet_security, + .free_call_crypto = none_free_call_crypto, .secure_packet = none_secure_packet, .verify_packet = none_verify_packet, .locate_data = none_locate_data, |